Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J Person article on Canales and game plan and Rico

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

HPPantherzfan Mentor

HPPantherzfan

Posted
Posted

I honestly believe that DC knows exactly what he is doing, he is exposing BY!  Proving to everyone that BY isn’t it.  I believe it is his mission before the end of this season to send Bryce out there, trying to light it up, just to fail so when they move on from him this offseason DC has no detractors, no locker room issues and most importantly no David Tepper issues.  Is it hurting us now?  Yes but Dave knows a little pain now is well worth the future without BY

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted

I don’t think that.  
I might think that he is pushing Young to sink or swim. Rise to the challenge or don’t.

I could think that he believed Young was gonna kill it. 

Not sure what I think past if Young can’t do it we need to try someone else. And I don’t think he can do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncbob Collaborator

ncbob

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Waldo said:

Lol Rico isn't coming back regardless lol.

DC isn't a terrible HC but he also isn't good. He is a solid OC way over his head and another year isn't changing that IMO. 

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncbob Collaborator

ncbob

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, csx said:

I have eased up on this. He was incredibly stupid Monday. However I dont advocate firing. We cant keep doing that and expect better coaches.

He better have learned that obvious lesson 

It’ll be extremely hard to bring an elite coach into this dumpster fire, not to mention having to deal with the Teppers.  So yeah, fix the QB problem and then deal with coaching if need be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, ncbob said:

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

I would agree but he has about a half capable QB to deal with. That offense has to be limited.  I can’t imagine what he had to pull off the table.  Just play action alone, big challenge. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

Here's what really sucks.  I would bet almost bet to every man on this forum that if we went 7-10 or 8-9 they would have said it was a successful season.  Say we beat N.O. and TB gives us the last game of the season because they can't lose the division and won't play their top players.

We go 8-9.  Canales is a genius, and we are stuck with Young and Canales for another year.  Worst part is we only beat 1 quality team in GB minus TB who won't play their starters.

I've had enough of Canales's moronic game planning.  There is no excuse for the amount of carries this team had Sunday.  Yeah, it was fun to see Bryce have a career day against Atlanta. If you play sports long enough, you'll have a day where you couldn't do no wrong.  To game plan around the passing game was just plan moronic.   SF defense was mediocre at best, and we managed 1 TD and 1 FG.  WTF.

But watch and see.  We'll end up 7-10 or 8-9 and everyone is going to say we had a good year.  Canales and Young are back in the saddle in 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I actually disagree. As many morons as the Huddle has, it's very hard to be as grossly incompetent as David Tepper has been.

I don't care if we fire Canales or not. He will get that accomplished himself soon enough without any Huddle input at all.

Its clear what they were trying to do.  You know how when a team gets exposed by another team and everyone is like well thats the blueprint to beating them.  The 49ers game before us they gave up an NFL record 47 completions to Jacoby Brissett of all people.  I assume they thought if Brissett could dink and dunk pick apart the 49ers then our qb definitely can.  Unfortunately they thought wrong on that part.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncbob Collaborator

ncbob

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, strato said:

I would agree but he has about a half capable QB to deal with. That offense has to be limited.  I can’t imagine what he had to pull off the table.  Just play action alone, big challenge. 

Man I totally agree, half the playbook is gathering dust because of our QB, but we’re not using the proven weapons that we have, totally frustrating.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...