Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)


Hoenheim
 Share

Your belief in bryce through 3 years   

231 members have voted

  1. 1. How encouraged are you by bryce youngs performance thus far through 3 years

    • 10 Love him , franchise QB for the next decade
      2
    • 9 He's great but needs a tiny bit of polishing
      9
    • 8 He's very good
      15
    • 7 He's good, but not great.
      35
    • 6 he's decent maybe slightly above average
      54
    • 5 he's an average nfl qb that may be destined to be a backup caliber QB
      69
    • 4 he's bad, but he can be at least decent with a couple more years of experience
      13
    • 3 Not a good QB, probably can't be redeemed. But maybe he can be a project someone else can fix
      28
    • 1-2 Terrible, get him off my team, yesterday.
      6


Recommended Posts

I understand the popular consensus is that Canales, Morgan and the entire front office are idiots that will roll with Bryce forever and give him multiple 9 figure contracts.

I think they see what we see. A quality vet will be signed.  A development QB will be drafted. Bryce will be "injured" around week 4-6.  

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

I understand the popular consensus is that Canales, Morgan and the entire front office are idiots that will roll with Bryce forever and give him multiple 9 figure contracts.

I think they see what we see. A quality vet will be signed.  A development QB will be drafted. Bryce will be "injured" around week 4-6.  

This is exactly how I see it playing out.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2026 at 7:36 AM, CRA said:

Bridge tier QB.  If you put Atlanta to the side, great games flat out have never existed in his 3 year career.  And his good isn’t on par with good games of other NFL QBs.   There comes a ceiling with Bryce that isn’t undeniable and that just isn’t what any team in the NFL longs for. 

He can be the QB next year, you just can’t pay him because we have to be looking for the actual future at the QB spot.  

he played a very good game for Bryce yesterday…..and every QB that played yesteray (and no one was great) generated more offense for their teams.   And we got legit weapons.  I don’t care where Coker was drafted.  No one feels sorry for Stafford because Puca was a late pick.  

Agree 100%. Saturday was as good as he gets, and that's pretty average. I haven't followed college football to know if we can upgrade picking at 19 (plus OT is suddenly a huge need).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moving goal posts for Bryce both ways is wild. But for the most part, this place is overtly negative. First, it was he didn’t show flashes at all of being a #1 pick: he’s done that for sure. Then it was he cannot throw the deep ball and we want to see him take more shots: he’s done that and gotten much better with his timing and accuracy on deep shots. Then it was he can only win with a dominant ground game getting 200+ yards: we haven’t had a ground game since October, he pretty much carried the offense and almost took down the Rams.

I get it, you didn’t want him and think he’s too small and weak and nothing will change that. But holy hell give the guy a break. “31 other starters can do what he’s doing” You put a statue back there like Stroud and see how many sacks we give up in that playoff game. I’m not saying he’s a top 15 qb but there are flashes to what he can be if he continues to improve. The disrespect to saying he’s a bottom 5 qb is wild lol

  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

The moving goal posts for Bryce both ways is wild. But for the most part, this place is overtly negative. First, it was he didn’t show flashes at all of being a #1 pick: he’s done that for sure. Then it was he cannot throw the deep ball and we want to see him take more shots: he’s done that and gotten much better with his timing and accuracy on deep shots. Then it was he can only win with a dominant ground game getting 200+ yards: we haven’t had a ground game since October, he pretty much carried the offense and almost took down the Rams.

I get it, you didn’t want him and think he’s too small and weak and nothing will change that. But holy hell give the guy a break. “31 other starters can do what he’s doing” You put a statue back there like Stroud and see how many sacks we give up in that playoff game. I’m not saying he’s a top 15 qb but there are flashes to what he can be if he continues to improve. The disrespect to saying he’s a bottom 5 qb is wild lol

I think people rightly expected to see flashes his first year and were rightly disappointed in what they saw on the field. 
There were some last year and he came in this year and stunk it up again to start the season. Has shown some flashes turned in some good play. Even managed to not be the biggest reason we lost in some losses. 
Three straight horrible stretches to open the season, will it be four? I see the good stuff but I don’t know how much I trust it.
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who chose option 5, what made you think Bryce is "an average NFL QB"? Everything we've seen with our own eyes and the stats strongly suggest he's bottom of the leap to historically bad. 

Edited by MRenshaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

From my vantage point last night (outside of the INT) there were 2 missed opportunities from him. On one of the 4th downs, when he rolled out towards the sideline he had McMillian wide open but he was staring somebody else down the whole time. 
 

If the throw to Chuba on the swing pass would have been a little more on target and he brought it in, there was nobody and I mean NOBODY on that side of the field. He could have took it 40 yards minimum if not all the way. little things like the above haunt him quite often

When Bryce is aggressive, he plays well. But when he gets stuck in that super conservative mode, he is just horrible. 

I honestly think the conservative play has alot to do with Canales 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matthew Stafford is in the running for the MVP this year and may win it. He missed more throws in this game than Bryce did. No QB is perfect, but it seems like Bryce has to play a perfect game for people here to think he’s not a bottom 5 qb. It’s crazy. 
 

He has come SO FAR since his first start back in 2023. I thought he’d be out of the league in a year back then. Now he is a competent starting QB who has shown plenty of flashes of greatness. Has carried our offense since week 14 and if he continues to improve( no reason to think otherwise) has the ability to take us to a Super Bowl. 

Edited by LelouchBritannia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...