Legette for Coleman?

[kungfoodude]

15 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Don't particularly care to have either one. I'd rather just get whatever pick we can for XL.

Maybe there's a team desperate for WR help that will overpay for a young player they liked pre-draft, similar to Dallas giving us a 4th for Jonathan Mingo.

I agree. Put him on the block officially and see what you can get. If it's a conditional 6th or 7th, fine. 

I think it would be best for him to be traded a considerable distance from this area and likely the South so that he can try to focus on football for a chance.

[ForJimmy]

10 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

This is an elementary school lunch room level trade.

What flavor snack pack do you have today?

[NAS]

Such a dumb idea

[kungfoodude]

23 minutes ago, NAS said:

Such a dumb idea

IDK how we go from good player for good player trade suggestions to dumpster fire bust for dumpster fire bust trade suggestions.

Even though Coleman is better, he has a littany of motivation and discipline issues. Do we think milquetoast Dave is gonna fix that??

[Shocker]

I actually wanted Coleman over Leggette in the draft but Coleman is a head case.  No thanks

[LinvilleGorge]

I'd honestly rather just trade XL for a late round pick than acquire someone else's problem child. 

[SOJA]

I wouldn't do this. XL had a bad year but he showed a lot of promise as a rookie for a guy we KNEW was going to take some time to develop 

You can hate the pick if you want but now that we've got XL I would give him one more season to see if he can round into a contributor. 

Coleman has always struck me as a guy that was not going to put the work in to be great. might be wrong but that's my gut read on him. 

[SOJA]

The real problem is XL is where we drafted him. If we had taken him mid second round I think the outrage surrounding him would be far less. Not his fault they traded up (one spot) to make him a first round pick 

[strato]

25 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I wouldn't do this. XL had a bad year but he showed a lot of promise as a rookie for a guy we KNEW was going to take some time to develop 

You can hate the pick if you want but now that we've got XL I would give him one more season to see if he can round into a contributor. 

Coleman has always struck me as a guy that was not going to put the work in to be great. might be wrong but that's my gut read on him. 

I am with you. Give XL an offseason and a camp to respond. He may not be a 1st round level contributor but may be able to contribute to the team in a lesser role.  

If someone calls and offers a 3rd I would do it but if it is a day three thing I’d rather roll the dice on him for now.

I bet he didn’t see this coming until it about just hit him.  He isn’t that quick, unfortunately. Let him get his head around it and see what happens. 


 

[h0llywood]

At this stage, we know who are X and Z receivers are. Trading XL for anyone else who doesn't operate primarily out of the slot doesn't make any sense. At this point, just move XL and stick him in the Y Slot and see what he can do.

[PNW_PantherMan]

4 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

What flavor snack pack do you have today?

Snack pack is not on the trading block.  This is like two kids exchanging items that nobody wants.

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, SOJA said:

The real problem is XL is where we drafted him. If we had taken him mid second round I think the outrage surrounding him would be far less. Not his fault they traded up (one spot) to make him a first round pick 

I disagree. He would be acceptable as a Day 3 pick but that is about it.

[strato]

1 hour ago, h0llywood said:

At this stage, we know who are X and Z receivers are. Trading XL for anyone else who doesn't operate primarily out of the slot doesn't make any sense. At this point, just move XL and stick him in the Y Slot and see what he can do.

Sounds like a plan to me.