Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING! Joe Person: “If Thieneman is available, he’s the #Panthers’ pick.”


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, frankw said:

@TD alt right now

tumblr_6b415c3940bce8e487fe4670ae744d34_4a08d53f_500.gif.1b624d097c8a086410d1a9c4a1a79d99.gif

Pretty dumb considering that I said that if I were picking, I'd probably pick Thieneman, but as usual some of you Huddlers truly seem like you just have a difficult time with more than any thing that's surface analysis. Hell, if I didn't know y'all's Huddle face anyway, I'd think that some of you just have issues with reading comprehension, but I'm going to give y'all that much credit. So, I guess it's just nonsensical trolling. 

Edited by TD alt
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I believe Cowboys secondary coach was his ex-college coach 

Vikings could use him as well.  Plus I've heard a couple people saying throw positional value out the window.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Pretty dumb considering that I said that if I were picking, I'd probably pick Thieneman, but as usual some of you Huddlers truly seem like you just have a difficult time with more than any thing that's surface analysis. Hell, if I didn't know y'all's Huddle face anyway, I'd think that some of you just have issues with reading comprehension, but I'm going to give y'all that much credit. So, I guess it's just nonsensical trolling. 

It was only in jest man. I don't know when draft talk got so life and death for you but it might be time to unplug for your own mental health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, chknwing said:

would be great if Evero liked to play rookies.  This is why the defense was handled in free agency.  Id say safety in round 2 or 3.  Because he wont start under Evero, he wont be an impact player out the gate and Carolina has stated they want an impact player in round 1.  Round 1 will be offense.  Expect Sadiq or a WR.

That isn’t wrong about Evero and rookies. But he will play them. Played Scourton. I think if there is no one to keep you down, you’ll probably play. If he has a vet to use, it is much harder to move up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like we have an eye on WR, but Thieneman is our #1 target on defense.  Question is where does Thieneman slide in with the WRs? Most likely after the top-3?

You gotta think one of Tate/Tyson/Lemon or Thieneman will be there.  And it will be a very fine addition.  And McNeil-Warren and/or Cooper Jr would be the wildcards if they for some reason are all gone. 

Not much smoke around OL or Sadiq.  We met with McDonald IDL but he's probably lower than the first 4 on our board.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advertisement

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Advertisement

If we go safety #19 (using Dane Brugler's top 100) these players will be our options 2nd round @51  Value would be another defensive player 

Edited by TheSpecialJuan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

If we go safety #19 (using Dane Brugler's top 100) these players will be our options 2nd round @51  Value would be another defensive player 

I suspect they would take Hill Jr. In that scenario. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...