Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1: The Carolina Panthers select OT Monroe Freeling (Georgia)


rodeo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

He better beat out Walker in camp or this is a wasted pick

I don't think it's wasted even if he doesn't. If he never lived up to his potential, sure, but this wasn't a pick for this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

It sounds like I hate the pick but I don't, he just doesn't help this year's team much. If the staff can fix the technique issues, you've got a 10+ year probowl LT. Which immediately makes this a good pick because at 19 in the first, the gamble is 100% worth it. 

On the bright side of it, his inexperience could be ensuring they don’t have as much for him to do unlearn as they might with an older more experienced guy.  
But yeah the big picture is would you punt a year if you believed you could get ten quality seasons of LT? Most people would I think. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

On the bright side of it, his inexperience could be ensuring they don’t have as much for him to do unlearn as they might with an older more experienced guy.  
But yeah the big picture is would you punt a year if you believed you could get ten quality seasons of LT? Most people would I think. 

I think the Panthers have one of the best group of Oline coaches in the NFL, so I think it's more likely than not that he reaches his ceiling in Carolina. 

Which means I think they drafted a 10+ year starting probowl LT at 19th overall. Pretty good deal if you ask me. 

I said it in one of these threads, great pick for the 2027-2028 Panthers and beyond. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Five straight years of the first pick being spent on offense. Two tackles, two receivers, one qb. 

All for an offense that ranks near the bottom in most stats

The roster was devoid of talent.  That's what happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’ll be starting at some point this season. There’s no depth behind either tackle position and injuries are bound to happen. He’s prob the most athletic OL on the roster. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

If he ends up being a probowl LT for 10 years but doesn't start this year... It's a wasted pick???? 😕

First round picks need to be Day 1 starters unless you’re loaded and Super Bowl ready.  I am not saying he won’t develop into a great LT but we need immediate impact players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehh, I understand why they did it, but just really sucks to be in that spot. There was a better choice for the first round IMO, maybe he’ll surprise me but I wouldn’t bet on it. Very raw, doesn’t seem very fluid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, NAS said:

He better beat out Walker in camp or this is a wasted pick

Come on. Even if he became a 10 year starter for us? 

Imagine if the Packers or Chiefs were that short sighted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Ehh, I understand why they did it, but just really sucks to be in that spot. There was a better choice for the first round IMO, maybe he’ll surprise me but I wouldn’t bet on it. Very raw, doesn’t seem very fluid. 

Fluidity is his one biggest strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...