Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what does Bryce's 2026 season need to look like for you to be oaky with extending him?


 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Keep improving, Canales needs to let Bryce throw over 30 at times a game minimum, let him make mistakes and be aggressive downfield.

He calls downfield plays, Young just doesn't take them unless they're High School wide open. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Canales/Morgan took over, the team had the least amount of talent of any team in the NFL. There were no receivers or TE's to speak of, the O-line was made up mainly of practice squad player and the defense had DB and Horn - everyone else was JAG. Morgan didn't invest the resources just to guarantee Young's success. These were investments needed regardless who the QB was/is. Not sure why everyone keeps "blaming" Young for investing in talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, cranky said:

When Canales/Morgan took over, the team had the least amount of talent of any team in the NFL. There were no receivers or TE's to speak of, the O-line was made up mainly of practice squad player and the defense had DB and Horn - everyone else was JAG. 

when canales was hired to hand hold bryce, they already had their starting tackles as well as multiple players that would be good starters on the oline in 2024/2025. The team had a 1000 yard receiver, and tight ends don't matter to canales because they're not using them to stretch the seam anyway.

The defense was blown up to sign the biggest IL linemen in free agency so bryce could become a top 22 qb.

Problems with the defense were created by the impulse to drown bryce in resources, and the talent level on offense wasn't nearly as dire when canales took over as some like to pretend. Most of the oline looking as horrible as they did in 2023 was bryce not being able to drop back like a full grown nfl qb

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

3,700 yards + passing

25 -30 passing TDs

> 5 rushing TDs

< 15 INTs

 > 90 passer rating

no costly fumbles

continue clutch performances and lead this team to another division title and a playoff win  

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I'm curious how many hear know Cam's stats in 2014.  His contract year before he signed his 2nd contract.  

It's amazing to me the double standard on here on the huddle.  What Cam did was more than good enough to earn his 2nd contract. No questions asked.  Bryce couldn't even do enough for most of you on here.  

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, electro&#x27;s horse said:

when canales was hired to hand hold bryce, they already had their starting tackles as well as multiple players that would be good starters in 2024/2025. The team had a 1000 yard receiver, and tight ends don't matter to canales because they're not using them to stretch the seam anyway. The defense was blown up to sign the biggest IL linemen in free agency so bryce could become a top 22 qb.

Problems with the defense were created by the impulse to drown bryce in resources, and the talent level on offense wasn't nearly as dire when canales took over as some like to pretend.

Young's rookie year was 2023. Canales was hired in 2024. In 2023 Young had Thielen, Mingo, Chark, Shenault, Tremble and Hurst to throw to. His gaurds were Zavala and Jensen. And you are correct that they had a 1000 yard receiver. But Theilen was a 32 year old receiver at the time so everyone knew he would need to be replaced fairly soon. Regardless, I'm not sure how you can believe those guys didn't need to be upgraded - regardless of who the QB was/is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I'm curious how many hear know Cam's stats in 2014.  His contract year before he signed his 2nd contract.  

It's amazing to me the double standard on here on the huddle.  What Cam did was more than good enough to earn his 2nd contract. No questions asked.  Bryce couldn't even do enough for most of you on here.  

Stats are overrated. Great example.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, cranky said:

Young's rookie year was 2023. Canales was hired in 2024. In 2023 Young had Thielen, Mingo, Chark, Shenault, Tremble and Hurst to throw to. His gaurds were Zavala and Jensen. And you are correct that they had a 1000 yard receiver. But Theilen was a 32 year old receiver at the time so everyone knew he would need to be replaced fairly soon. Regardless, I'm not sure how you can believe those guys didn't need to be upgraded - regardless of who the QB was/is.

I was responding specifically to a poster talking about Canales taking over which was in 2024, who also said the entire offense was bereft of talent. That simply isn’t true, especially the part about the offensive line being mostly practice squad players. Moton, Iggy, and Christensen were already on the team.

im not arguing against upgrading positions on offense, but Dan shouldnt get credit for that while ignoring the biggest talent hole on the unit.

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, fanpanther said:

Brock Purdy holds the highest active career Total QBR in NFL history, hovering near a \(68.4\) mark. He is closely followed by two-time MVP Patrick Mahomes.  

 

Brock Purdy while injured this past season led the 49ers on a game winning drive against the Seahawks in week 1 had a QBR over 90 2 TDs & almost 300 yards but for whatever reason that is irrelevant?

they are trying to this very confusing player opponent comparision using Bryce Young ,Brock Purdy & the 2025 Seattle Seahawks defense where alot of important facts are left out of the equation...just saying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Basbear said:

I think with the investment, they are hoping BY can remain a panther QB. I get that and all, but like I posted above his rank has gone from 32 to 28 to 26..... that's still not #1 overall I carry the team good. But they hope he can make the jump, who knows.......I was never a believer, but I have seen tiny talent and know about the poor level of players and coaches he's had around......

That's exactly how I feel about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...