Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not kicking a field goal on that last offensive series could have cost us the game.


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

If the FG was missed, the ball would be at the 32 instead of the 20 where the ball was after the punt. Not that much difference which is why I think it would've been worth it to try to put the game away instead of punting. If we lost at the end, all these posters calling names and acting like they are better posters for supporting the decision would agree.

Would have been on or about the 40. It's not at the line of scrimage it's where it was kicked from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is a baussneggar and who the fug are you

I'm not criticizing the move, I know Rivera is the coach and I am not for a reason. I'm saying I don't understand it. Given the fact that our defense is notoriously full of holes, it seems like it'd more of a liability to leave the win to the defense than to a very solid kicker in Mare.

It's all moot at this point; as several people have brought up, we won, so it was the right call when you look at it that way. It just seemed like an overly risky call to me. You all can stop pooping your pants now.

At that point, trying to kick a 50 yard field goal when his career long is 53 yards is risky. Especially when the field is extremely wet. The risk was he misses it and they get the ball at the 40 versus making the play and making them go 95 yards. I get where you are coming from as I thought he should have kicked the field goal as well at the time. Especially since they didn't down it and the ball was still placed at the 20 which would have been only a 20 yard change in field position if they had gone for the fg, But since then I can see why it might have been risky. I still think I would have tried the field goal, but that is why I am not coaching I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agreed with coaches call. There is a high probability he misses that kick, the snap or the hold is mishandled. Simply put, a lot more could go wrong than right. With only 1 minute left, I agree with leaving it up to the kid to drive 80 yards in his first start in poor field conditions. In addition, except for the breakdown of our D at the end of the 1st half their O was highly ineffective. Against a top QB like Brees or Brady, I would be more in favor of trying to ice it, because 15 extra yard or whatever it would have been if he missed it wouldnt scare them a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody that disagrees with the call to punt simply doesn't know football. That is all there is to it.

On a day when we saw roughly 10 fumbles due to the weather, one on special teams by perhaps the most veteran of all veteran punters in the league, you're going to put Jansen, Baker, and Mare in a position where they have three opportunities to screw up? Jansen has to fire a snap low and accurate, Baker has to grab the ball out of the air and plant it in a few inches of water and mud all while getting the ball in the proper position to be kicked, and Mare has to kick a water logged and coated ball 50 YARDS out of a mud puddle when the opposing offense already needs a TD to win the game? Give your head a shake.

I seriously can't believe anybody feels like they should have gone for the FG in that situation. Every NFL coach in the league laughs at you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't a black-and-white call. Miss it, you give Jacksonville good field position. Make it, 2 score lead. Punt it, longer field regardless with an offense that has to pass with a rookie QB who hasn't looked impressive. When they marched on us, it was due to MJD. They didn't have time to run the ball. Therefore, punting was the right call. Especially if we could have pinned them inside the 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is an idiot for thinking maybe we should have kicked a FG. It isn't a clear cut choice guys, just because someone disagrees doesn't mean they are idiots. In fact if you weren't a pussy sitting at home you'd know that by that late in the game the field was wet, but not flooded anymore. A lot of time had elapsed, it had seeped in. At least it was not visible like it was earlier from my seat.

That probably made it even more of a tougher decision for Rivera, but saying that 'someone doesn't know football' is stupid, only thing people didn't know was the condition of the field, not fuging football, because the condition of the field is what ultimately made up the decision.

All we know is it was the right decision, we won't know if FG was a good or bad decision, so it isn't 'stupid' to wonder about it, what's stupid is to not consider everything. There is no 'right call' only 'a call' and it was successful, and that doesn't equate to the other call being a failure/unsuccessful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread needs to end. Every decision made in a football game has the potential to cause a team to lose a game and win a game. You are not a coach nor in a position to make those decisions. You either trust your coaching staff or you dont, In which case you may need to find another team to cheer for. Supporting the panthers means supporting the calls and decisions the staff makes as they do so in the best interest of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread needs to end. Every decision made in a football game has the potential to cause a team to lose a game and win a game. You are not a coach nor in a position to make those decisions. You either trust your coaching staff or you dont, In which case you may need to find another team to cheer for. Supporting the panthers means supporting the calls and decisions the staff makes as they do so in the best interest of the team.

So 98% of the board are not Panther fans since we wanted Fox out last season and didn't agree with his calls. Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is an idiot for thinking maybe we should have kicked a FG. It isn't a clear cut choice guys, just because someone disagrees doesn't mean they are idiots. In fact if you weren't a pussy sitting at home you'd know that by that late in the game the field was wet, but not flooded anymore. A lot of time had elapsed, it had seeped in. At least it was not visible like it was earlier from my seat.

That probably made it even more of a tougher decision for Rivera, but saying that 'someone doesn't know football' is stupid, only thing people didn't know was the condition of the field, not fuging football, because the condition of the field is what ultimately made up the decision.

All we know is it was the right decision, we won't know if FG was a good or bad decision, so it isn't 'stupid' to wonder about it, what's stupid is to not consider everything. There is no 'right call' only 'a call' and it was successful, and that doesn't equate to the other call being a failure/unsuccessful.

Best post in this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...