Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our worse defense ever?


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

According to that...

1999 offense + 2002 defense = Super Bowl

And the 2001 defense slightly is worse than the current one. That's weird because I remember the games being close back then. I think we loss like 7 games by a TD or less? And it wasn't because of our offense.

aside from the Titans debacle, all of our games have been pretty close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the year of Steve Beurlein and the team finished 8-8. I think it was 1999. The offense was a passing machine, but the defense was swiss cheese. They couldn't stop anyone. Our defense in 2004 was atrocius until Mark Fields and others stepped up and turned things around. In 2001 the defense lost 4th quarter leads at least 3 or 4 times.

In all of these cases the teams were affected by injuries, scheme, personnel, effort, skill (or lack thereof), luck, and desire.

However, none of those defensive sides were worse than our current situation. Right now the scheme is just a poor fit for our personnel and teams are just picking us apart. Detroit completely dominated our red zone passing defense (which had been a strength for so long)to the tune of 50 points! We were up 17! We were up 13 on GB and pissed that away, too. We were up on NO...RR pissed that W right away.

I don't think I've ever seen a defense (and team in general) so poorly coached. I must be honest about that. It has been truly horrifying. As fun as the offense is to watch, this team is losing every lead. Ron Rivera doesn't know how to win on offense or defense.

I'll say it. It's at least as bad as Seifert in the 1-15 season. At least as bad, if not the worst of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it's the worst ever, I kind of feel like it is but don't have the energy to go look through stats. With that said, in my personal opinion it's certainly been the most disappointing.

Watching Denver's massive improvement on that side of the ball doesn't hep either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely the most disheartening defense we've ever fielded, both statistically and for the long line of walking wounded that head each week to IR. Even Peyton Manning couldn't put enough points on the board to protect a lead with the defensive efforts we've shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...can't really be sugar coated. it's the worst.

they'll turn around and they'll become dominant again...just not this year.

too many key missing pieces.

too young and undisciplined (aside form the penalties, they're just missing assignments and "freelancing").

too little time in the system.

too little consistency in the lineup. the thing is in constant flux as they try to fill holes and weaknesses.

it should shake out in the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of looking at just points or yards surrendered I looked at which team gave up the most second half leads or which gave the most points in the money quarter between 2001 and 2011.

IN 2011 we have been leading or were ahead at some point in the second half in 9 out of 10 games. Of those games we lost, we blew leads in 7 of those 8 games or 87.5%. We blew leads in the fourth quarter in 6 of those 8 games or 75%.

Comparatively in 2001, we were leading or were ahead at some point in the second half in 10 out of 16 games. Of those 10 games we blew leads in 8 of those games in the second half or 80% and 6 of those 8 in the fourth quarter or 75%.

Don't know what the hell that means except they were both bad. Maybe the difference is that we were in more blowouts in 2001 where this year we have been in as many close games blowing fourth quarter leads in 10 games as we did all of 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...