Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RG? RT? or both?...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

The only thing we need to focus on offense this season is the right side of the line. Do we give Otah another chance with Bell/Schwartz as his backup? Do we upgrade at RG and keep Hangartner as the backup C and RG? Do we upgrade both positions?

I'm not sure which one is the bigger need. If Otah stays healthy, we should be fine there but then again he's never played a full season. Hangartner and Bell are solid but Im not so sure they should stay as the starters. There were games last season where the right side of the line was owned.

Bell bottom 20 in league in pass blocking according to pro football focus (47th to be exact, but 29th if you exclude the ties): http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/12/15/signature-stats-snapshot-offensive-tackle-pass-blocking-efficiency/

Football Outsiders show that we're around 5th in run blocking. However, 21st in pass blocking.

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol

The second chart in that link shows we're 23rd in the league running up the midddle, 24th running towards RT. However in the 3rd chart, we only run at the RT 10% of the time but up the middle 57% of the time.

It seems to me that since we are really good at run blocking as a group and weaker at pass blocking, we should upgrade who is the worst at pass blocking at the least. Then you're left to wonder if Otah will stay healthy next season and if so, your move will be for nought. So then you go back to thinking about upgrading the RG spot or just cutting Otah since he isn't dependable. It will be interesting to see how it unfolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pick up a 3rd and use 3rd and 4th on amini silatolu and mitchell schwartz.

or take the route we used a few years back and just bring in a bunch of OL to compete in the offseason/TC and hope that we have a group solid enough to get through the next year where we can address it better.

i just don't like using the first couple picks on anything on the offense this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have great depth a Guard, it wouldn't surprise me at all if we went with Reiff if he's available though. I'm sure management knows more than us about Otah and depending on how they feel, we may move on. OT just seems like a Hurney pick to me, I'd be happy with Reiff, Coples or Brockers with an emphasis on the defensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no reason to not roll with Otah at this point. He's only going to count a mill or so against the cap and it's his contract year. If ever he had a reason to play this is the year. If he doesnt perform he will be out of the NFL.

That being said I think if you have a chance to get a quality O-lineman in the draft you do it... and that goes for this year or any year. Esp if you can get a guy who can slide from RG to RT in the event of an injury.

I think the FO likes Hangman and will keep him around. He's not elite but he's servicable and you'd rather have solid guys over unknowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

otah will be our RT next year unless he shows up to camp looking like poo. then we can begin to worry about it. and even then, wasn't schwartz okay in that spot?

RG i don't see as a problem since hangartner, schwartz, and bernadeau should all be pretty cheap. and we already re-signed garry williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hangman is a solid starter. I can see picking someone up that can play both tackle and guard, and let him compete.

As far as right tackle, i don't think bell is the answer.

I'd suggest they draft a guy to groom for LT.

Getting our future LT is the bigger need. Could always move Gross back to right tackle for another 6 years. That is the best route to go IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hangman is a solid starter. I can see picking someone up that can play both tackle and guard, and let him compete.

As far as right tackle, i don't think bell is the answer.

I'd suggest they draft a guy to groom for LT.

Getting our future LT is the bigger need. Could always move Gross back to right tackle for another 6 years. That is the best route to go IMO.

Im hoping Ziemba is that guy, but he was quiet as hell last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went on pro-football weekly and they had Bell listed as giving up 4.75 sacks in 2011. That seems like a low amount. If that is true though, I am wondering why everyone wants to dump him so quickly. Sure it was at left tackle but a pro-bowler like D'bricksaw Ferguson gave up 9.5 sacks in 16 starts. With no offseason andno preseason Bell was thrust in with no support. I frankly thought he did pretty well given the circumstances. Who says a draft pick outside of the first or second round will do any better? I understand why the staff is high on his potential honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...