Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tell what the thread is about in the title


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

1261611415087.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind so mouch when people do that in thread titles because I usually don't look at them anyway. What I do hate though is when the same people bitch at me for making a thread about something that has already been created in another thread but their other thread was titled something stupid so I have no idea it's already been discussed.

For example:

Huddler X sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "OMGZ!!!1!! Did you guys hear?!??" This person also provides a link as the first sentence, so even if I do a mouse-over of their thread title for a preview it gives absolutely no indication as to what the thread is about.

Montsta sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "The Panthers just traded a 3rd round pick for Greg Olsen"

Huddler X then comes into my thread and berates me because a thread already exists on that topic.

That is the dickhead move I don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
    • Final Avs 9 Wild 6. Defense never entered the building lol.
×
×
  • Create New...