Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the Read Option Destroying our Runningbacks?


LelouchBritannia

Recommended Posts

While watching NFL Playbook Baldinger brought up a good point, the read option eliminates any options the runningbacks have once they get the ball. It has turned all of our runningbacks into the exact same back(one cut and go). It has eliminated all potential cutbacks and outside runs, not to mention the back never actually knows if they are going to get the ball so it creates hesitation.

Probably explains why Stewart has had more success in this scheme than Deangelo, as one of Deangelo's greates strengths is vision, and it becomes moot in this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you were all chomping at the bit for my two cents to pop up. Well here you go.

CRA is close. It is the way we are running the read option. Last year there was lots of movement after the snap. Everyone looked busy. Defenses had to follow everyone. This year. The plays is stagnant. No movement from anyone, so the D just goes to the ball.

Get back to the aggressive read option. Where at least the back is attacking the line of scrimmage when he gets the ball. Make that DE make a decision quicker. Then use his mistake against him. Get quicker. Play with urgency. And be aggressive. That is a read option.

IMO, All we are doing is a delayed handoff, or a modified draw. No where near a read option type offense. Get some movement going. Make the D react to you. That is what I miss most from last year. That aggressive offense was a thing of beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change title to: Is the Read Option Destroying our Offense?

Answer: Hell yes.

pretty much this...but i would also add "over-use of".

read option is a solid concept that can work...if the other team isn't expecting and getting it so often from our offense. the option has done nothing but limit what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, it isn't the play, it's just the degree to which we use it. I echo the need for that aggressive style of offense we saw last season. That was what made us successful. Moving guys pre-snap, create coverage confusion, cause teams to re-think any blitzes. You break the huddle in a formation and stick in it, it's not hard to adjust to. You can do it every now and then, but you need some movement. We don't have very much of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...