Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kurt Cobain's Cildhood Home For Sale


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-09-25-Kurt%20Cobain%20House/id-57e12874444b4837acd90cd75ef70a59

 

"The home, last assessed at less than $67,000, is being listed for $500,000. It's a short walk from a riverfront park dedicated to Cobain's memory, and the family said it would welcome a partnership to make the home into a museum. His room still has the stencil-like band names — Iron Maiden, Led Zeppelin — he reportedly put on the walls, as well as the holes he put in them."

 

"We've decided to sell the home to create a legacy for Kurt, and yes, there are some mixed feelings since we have all loved the home and it carries so many great memories," Cobain's sister, Kim Cobain, said in an emailed statement. "But our family has moved on from Washington, and (we) feel it's time to let go of the home."

 

28056590.jpg

 

Can you say "Money grab?" $500k for this? Seriously?

 

And I'll admit my bias as my opinion of Kurt Cobain and his music is quite possibly the most overrated stuff I've ever heard. The comparisons of his songwriting talent to Dylan and Lennon, the musicianship forever linked to another Seattle guitarist, Jimi Hendrix.....

 

Stop... just stop. The music wasn't that good, it's just that a lot of angst-starved music critics were done with the hair metal thing of the late 80's and needed something, anything to replace Poison, Motley Crue, Whitesnake, Great White and all the other hair metal bands. Just one problem some 20 years later... all those hair metal bands are still touring while the "grunge" movement lasted all of about 10 years. Sure, some of those bands are still out there, but....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Kurt is a bit overrated.  I'll also admit that he probably wasn't even the most talented musician in the band (honor goes to Grohl), but to say 80's hair metal was better or more relevant, is just not true.  Most of the big bands ARE still around.  Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam (better than ever), Soundgarden, Foo Fighters, are still putting out music and making a nice bit of cash.  Grunge was more than a genre, it was more like an era.  Bands today are still byproducts of grunge influences, whereas I hardly hear anything on the radio (new stuff, not saying it's "good" new stuff) that has been influenced by hair metal.   Grunge and post-grunge movement has lasted way longer than hair metal bands.   Their shows are good fun, don't get my wrong, and that's why people still go, but there is hardly any influence there.

 

And it was really Guns n Roses that killed hair metal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Kurt is a bit overrated.  I'll also admit that he probably wasn't even the most talented musician in the band (honor goes to Grohl), but to say 80's hair metal was better or more relevant, is just not true.  Most of the big bands ARE still around.  Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam (better than ever), Soundgarden, Foo Fighters, are still putting out music and making a nice bit of cash.  Grunge was more than a genre, it was more like an era.  Bands today are still byproducts of grunge influences, whereas I hardly hear anything on the radio (new stuff, not saying it's "good" new stuff) that has been influenced by hair metal.   Grunge and post-grunge movement has lasted way longer than hair metal bands.   Their shows are good fun, don't get my wrong, and that's why people still go, but there is hardly any influence there.

 

And it was really Guns n Roses that killed hair metal.

 

I didn't claim hair metal to be more relevant or better, I simply pointed out they are still on the road filling arenas while the resurgent Pearl Jam and other bands of the time are still playing to niche crowds.

 

I love AIC and Soundgarden, but one thing all of the grunge bands have in common- they all took hiatuses and returned with a newer sound that appeals to a wider audience than the original genre. The new Pearl Jam is "better than ever," as you say, because they've changed their style and become more mainstream. Some grunge purists would even argue that Pearl Jam has sold out, which was their own biggest rallying cry against the business in the 90's.

 

I would have to argue the whole "era versus genre" notion however. My frequent visits to iTunes in search of the new and obscure provide my reference. iTunes genres include metal, alternative and and hair metal, while there is no mention of grunge. It's simply lumped into the "altenative" category.

 

I don't hear the influence of grunge as much as you may, simply because of our listening tastes. But there is a reason Steel Panther is still the longest running concert on the Sunset Strip, first at the Roxy, now the House of Blues.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason you don't see grunge in itunes is because it's not really a genre, like I said, it's more of an era.  Technically, it probably is alternative like most of the rock in the 90's.  

 

And you are incorrect, Pearl Jam sells out almost everywhere.  The tickets for the Charlotte concert sold out in like minutes for TWC, I know, because I tried to snag some initially.  Pearl Jams' last album and so far the new one actually sound like "old" PJ so I'm not sure they really have sold out, since they are rarely even played on the radio.  I'm pretty sure you have to be getting radio airplay and whatnot to sell out.

 

I wouldn't really say AIC's sound changed that much either, just with a different guy singing with Layne.  

 

Besides, Neil Young was the godfather of grunge anyway, not Kurt.

 

Steel Panther is basically a parody of the 80's hair metal that everyone makes fun of, it's as much as a comedic act as anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...