Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CHFF Rankings, and the Panthers are...


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

5th?

 


Through Week 6 of the 2013 Regular Season

About our Quality Stats Power Rankings (below). This indicator ranks each team from No. 1 to 32 based upon average ranking across the board in each of our Quality Stats.

It's proven very adept at picking out NFL champs: New Orleans was No. 1 across the board in 2009 and won the Super Bowl; Indianapolis was No. 3 across the board in 2009, the highest-ranked AFC team, and won the AFC title. Green Bay was No. 1 across the board in 2010 and won the Super Bowl; Pittsburgh was No. 2 across the board and won the AFC title. The Texans were No. 1 across the board in 2011 before catastrophic injuries at quarterback derailed the team's likely Super Bowl run.

 

cjj0.png

 

This is seriously depressing.  It seems like we're a consensus top 5 team in the league or some poo going by all these sites.

 

More here: http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesnt it suck to get respect?

it does suck that there's not the corresponding wins, but knowing that this is a talented team and doing a lot of things right gives me hope. it's just a matter of time before the wins start falling into place, imo.

 

still thinking that the thing that has been holding us back the most is the coaching, but with rivera and shula doing what they did against the vikes and giants and seeing their failings against the cards and comparing it all with the first couple weeks...i think they may be turning the corner. maybe they already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey this means we're just a coaching staff away from success if Ron keeps figuring out how to blow games

Ron isn't a bad coach. He is a young coach still working on some situational stuff....but the guy is good.

On field talent IMO hasn't been good enough for him any year he has been here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...