Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FYI: Would be "shocking" if Giants re-sign Nicks...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Something to keep an eye on...

@DanGrazianoESPN: Oh, there are going to be so many. Justin Tuck's situation is a big one. It's possible he's earned a new deal with his big second half, but it's also possible they move on from a franchise pillar, which would be a huge story. Hakeem Nicks is a bit less so, since at this point I think it'd be shocking if he were back, and even if he is it'd be on a team-friendly deal. So I'm going to say that Manning extension to which I referred above. Fans may not love it when the Giants announce a huge-money, long-term commitment to Manning off his worst season, but a Manning extension is the surest way to create the 2014 cap room they need. And given what's out there, short-term and long-term, for potential replacements, it's the only move for them to make.

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/33027/twitter-mailbag-gilbride-thoughts

Giants have to give a new contract to Eli. They also have to sign Tuck. Nicks is coming off a down year. There's a real good chance he could come here with a not so big contract. Hope it works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in love with Nicks. Like I have aid in other threads: His knees are highly suspect. He just no longer gets the separation that he once did, and basically uses his big frame to out-muscle smaller CBs for the ball, the few times that he can get half-way open. His production hasn't equaled to his hype for the last few years, and I don't see risking a ton of money to find out if he can get back to his old self...which really never materialized. He's a big WR who seems to have some upside, but may just complete his busting ways.

 

$5 mil a year. I would be loath to give him that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

while Nicks' production is down this year in TDs he would still be our #1 receiver in yards and in ypc and is headed for one of his best seasons in yards and ypc.  his lack of TDs is, imo, an anomaly and not indicative of the quality of receiver he is.

 

he's still a very good receiver.  he hasn't looked that great this year, but no Giant has (other than Victor Cruz imo).  I think he still creates separation against most defenders and can really go after the ball.

 

but his durability is a huge concern.  can he finish a season?  he's never had a 16 game season in his career.  

 

all depends what he wants to be paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He should've been more than a JAG, but Jeremy Chinn.  I was convinced he was our next defensive star 
    • I see what you did there
    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
×
×
  • Create New...