Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

World War II’s Strangest Battle: When Americans and Germans Fought Together


Panthro

Recommended Posts

 

Days after Hitler’s suicide a group of American soldiers, French prisoners, and, yes, German soldiers defended an Austrian castle against an SS division—the only time Germans and Allies fought together in World War II. Andrew Roberts on a story so wild that it has to be made into a movie.

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/12/world-war-ii-s-strangest-battle-when-americans-and-germans-fought-together.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My boss had an awesome reply to this topic, figured I would share:

 

war.jpg

To quote him....

Take a good look at this picture and notice what’s actually happening here. This is a water-color painting done by one of my Grandfathers medical officers who survived the battle. The area is between Kommerscheidt and Vossenack Germany in the Huertgen forest. The trail they’re walking on is called the Kall Trail. There is an aid station in the background where numerous wounded American soldiers were trapped behind enemy lines. In the foreground you can see American and German medics working on a seriously wounded American GI. In this general area there are still nearly 100 missing Americans that were never recovered and many, many more Germans. 

 

Very close by there is a German minefield called Wilde Sau (wild pig) minefield. During the Huertgen battle an American G.I. was severely injured by a mine he stepped on. The man was begging for help as he was bleeding to death stuck in the middle of it. A German officer saw this and attempted to retrieve the wounded American himself (he could have ordered one of his men to do the task). While working his way through the minefield he tripped a mine and was killed. There is a monument on that ground to this German officer.

 

 

 

Thought that was an interesting reply to go with the story you posted Panthro. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting when you look at the first sentence inscribed:

"No man hath greater love than he who layeth down his life for his enemy"

Usually you will see brother but haven't seen this used with the enemy.

Kudos for the history lesson OP.

I couldn't agree more ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...