Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something upsetting about next season...no running game


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Running game is as putrid as the passing game.First off (not to mention any names), having a player that can never play and kill our cap with a ridiculous contract is maddening.To be handcuffed with this crap with no way out for another season or three sucks. Every team in our division next year will be more competitive and we need all the help we can get on offense. Our running game sucks..13 for 33 yesterday (Williams is about done) and the oline needs help big time....but 33 yards? Something has to change or Cam wont make it a full season (he is the whole running game) If there is more bike riding while we cant gain one yard I will puke. You can add fixing the running game to the list of needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deangelo and his 2 yards an a cloud of dust hamper us more than Stewart.

 

We pay him so much money we feel obligated to give him carries. I would rather him run for 4-5 yards on every play than 1-2 yards and the occasional big run.

 

After his typical 1st down runs we are left 2nd and Long...like 2nd and 8/9.. Then if we go back to him like we did on the first drive of the second half we get 3rd and 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deangelo and his 2 yards an a cloud of dust hamper us more than Stewart.

 

We pay him so much money we feel obligated to give him carries. I would rather him run for 4-5 yards on every play than 1-2 yards and the occasional big run.

 

After his typical 1st down runs we are left 2nd and Long...like 2nd and 8/9.. Then if we go back to him like we did on the first drive of the second half we get 3rd and 7.

 

Stew's contract is worse and he can't get on the field.

 

Exactly how does DWill hamper us more than Stewart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...