Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those interested: A break down of the $$$: salary + cap, err "slush fund" per ESPN/D. Newton


top dawg

Recommended Posts

According to David Newton, we have $4,491,421 left in cap space, and we will largely leave that amount intact for emergency signings and such:

 

"You have to have a slush fund," general manager Dave Gettleman said last week at the NFL owners meeting. "You can't spend up to the number."

 

 

 They have $56,338,038 committed to the offense, $62,686,064 to the defense and $3,319,670 to special teams for a total of $122,343,772. 

Of that, the top 51 that counts toward the salary cap is $114,218,272. Add $19,965,241 of dead money and the total comes to $134,183,513. 

With carry over money from last season, Carolina's real cap number is $138,674,934 instead of the $133 million set by the league. That's leaves the $4,491,421 in cap space. 

If you want a few more breakdowns, the Panthers have $15,632,450 committed to running backs. That's 12.8 percent of their cap. They have only $5,733,378 committed to wide receivers -- or 4.69 percent -- which should come as no surprise after losing their top four from last season. 

On defense, $31,151,396 is committed to the ends compared to $3,995,750 to the cornerbacks. again, no surprise with Hardy counting $13.1 million after getting the franchise tag and Charles Johnson a team-high $16,420,000.   

 

 

Hit the link if you want to see the salaries of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its dumb for fans to go this in depth, and obsess over the cap. Just relax and be a fan.

 

it kind of reminds me of the conversation going on between The Walking Dead TV show and The Walking Dead comics, just sit back and watch what happens...stop over analyzing everything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its dumb for fans to go this in depth, and obsess over the cap. Just relax and be a fan.

 

"Dumb" is a strong word.  Some people enjoy numbers.  Indeed, numbers can give fans more understanding of why things are the way they are.  To be honest, before Jake was re-signed and Charles Johnson got his huge deal, I didn't pay attention to the business side of the team one bit, but Hurney kind of forced my hand.  That being said, it's nothing that you have to obsess over unless that floats your boat.  Moreover, some might say that being preoccupied with the NFL, the team, the draft, free agency, the Huddle and everything else is "dumb". But to each his own.  

 

I could argue that scrutinizing the numbers can give some fans even more of an appreciation for the team.  It's just something to do, just like anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams with a WR that's better than any WR on our roster...

Arizona

Atlanta

Buffalo

Baltimore

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Dallas

Denver

Detroit

Greenbay

Houston

Indianapolis

Jacksonville-Debatable if you count Blackmon's potential

Kansas City

Miami

Minnesota-Debatable

New Orleans

New York

New York

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

San Diego

San Francisco

Seahawks-Debatable if you want to get into Percy Harvin

Tampa

Tennessee

Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the running back cap is too high, no debate.  Still with increased emphasis on the running game it is understandable that we would have more invested in the position than other teams that utilize a different scheme like a WCO and don't rely on their running game or don't use their running backs to block on deep vertical passes.  As for DEs, that number is really for this year only.  There is no way we will go into next season with that large of a number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...