Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foucme? No, No, FOUCAULT!


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Looking back at last night, I don't feel David Foucault didn't play any worse than Byron Bell. Admittedly, that isn't high praise, but considering Foucault is an UDFA it speaks better of him than it does Bell.

 

I can definitely see Foucault catching on as a backup left tackle tackle, with Bell being no more than a backup right tackle in a Panthers utopia. His size and athleticism is superior, and his play will only get better with experience.

 

 

gallery_1_10_143109.jpg

 

gallery_1_10_152601.jpg

 

 

BTW, the Panthers helped him out quite a bit last night, chipping the defensive ends with Deangelo and Stewart. Pictured below Deangelo gets a really nice shot on Galette. They may want to consider keeping this in for Bell when he returns.

 

gallery_1_10_370572.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as soon as he stopped getting chip help from the TEs and Backs, he was turrible.

That last sack in the game where he got bull rushed and bent over completely backwards was just embarrassing.

Byron would have at least fallen to the side instead of tasting that saints players' jewels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...