Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st take destroys the Panthers FO, "Panthers Sold Cam Newton Out"


Recommended Posts

USA today also slamming them. "the sinkhole". Panthers #1 in the article "teams that should be in contention but are in deep trouble". Says F.O threw Cam under the bus with this offense, Rivera hard headed for not taking him out, and Cam should consider leaving if things don't improve. Sh$t starting to hit the fan now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with them! That hurts saying that lol but they are right. It's a shame that he is being hung out to dry and has to shoulder all the blame himself. In his press conference he never throws anyone under the bus but he takes accountability on what is going on with this team. Our coaches are cowards and I wish Rivera never got extension. He is suppose to be your franchise QB. Help the kid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know it's bad when you're stuck agreeing with these two clowns.

If they see it, how do you think Cam REALLY feels. He constantly says all the right things to the media and stuff. Behind those quotes Cam probably can't wait to get the hell out.

How is he suppose to inspire a guy like Byron Bell when every time he's picking himself up off the ground Bell is standing there completely lost. Same goes for Amini and Chandler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys look at the positive:

The Panthers caved to national pressure and benched Hardy... Maybe now they'll do it again and fire shula and get the poo together on the offensive side of the ball.

actually from what I heard out of the Rivera and DG next week it was the NFL that said to bench Hardy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys look at the positive:

The Panthers caved to national pressure and benched Hardy... Maybe now they'll do it again and fire shula and get the poo together on the offensive side of the ball.

It's hard to continuously blame Shula when the blame should be Ron and Gettlemen for keeping this atrocious offensive line as our starters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...