Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Josh Norman command a big contract next offseason?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Having had long conversations with Josh I think he will accept a reasonable contract and stay in Carolina. Josh is ego driven, not money driven. He wants respect and validation more than money, which is rare in a pro athlete.

Having listened to two extremely entertaining pod casts feat. Norman, I get the same feeling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think he'd sign a contract extension this offseason or is it even worth it given his history? No doubt they could get him cheaper now than later.

Possibly.

A nice thing about Josh is that once he gets a nice contract, he won't slack off at all like some others have. That's a great benefit about not being money driven. Josh won't be complacent until he is a perrinial all pro and probowler. That means much more to him than dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you amaze me. Thread after thread someone is complaining about the back end of our defense. We finally have that player (though it took a couple years to develop) and now we think he isn't worth paying for.

Hopefully, DG is going to get a solid deal done with him but make no mistake. Norman as important of a player for the defensive backfiield as CJ or Star is for the DL, Luke for the LBs.

Figure out a way to pay him for another 5 yrs or so and let him retire a Panther.

You don't pay guys big and sweet deals who only have 7 games of legit play to their name....with lots of bad prior.

Yes, hopefully it just took him awhile to "get it". You still don't throw cash at a guy like that. A a nice R easonable deal should be offered....nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly.

A nice thing about Josh is that once he gets a nice contract, he won't slack off at all like some others have. That's a great benefit about not being money driven. Josh won't be complacent until he is a perrinial all pro and probowler. That means much more to him than dollars.

 

Gotta think Gettleman has had something to do with that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton - cam is gonna get paid. No getting around that.

Luke Kuechly - he doesn't strike me as a money guy, but the guy has already proven he should be highest paid. MLB in the game.

Greg Olsen - will never command a huge contract, and will want to remain/retire a Panther.

Thomas Davis - Same of Olsen

Mike Tolbert - is a carolina boy. He took less money already just to become a Panther. He'll do the same to remain.

Josh Norman - See what Jeremy said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Panthers even think of a huge contract. Probably not even big. As much as I love Josh, he is replaceable. That's not saying he isn't good, but I'm sure that someone could fill that role.

As of right now I'm not sure about that. Norman has size and incredible ball skills for a corner. He can maybe make a pretty good wide receiver. When you have those things teams don't even look ur way out of respect, he can make you pay at any given moment like sherman which is very valuable. Not somebody you wanna let walk so easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton - cam is gonna get paid. No getting around that.

Luke Kuechly - he doesn't strike me as a money guy, but the guy has already proven he should be highest paid. MLB in the game.

Greg Olsen - will never command a huge contract, and will want to remain/retire a Panther.

Thomas Davis - Same of Olsen

Mike Tolbert - is a carolina boy. He took less money already just to become a Panther. He'll do the same to remain.

Josh Norman - See what Jeremy said.

What purpose did Tolbert even serve this year? He gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can afford Cam Kuechly and Norman.  Usually year 1 and 2 are cheap on a long term contract as the signing bonus which is prorated serves as the salary in year 1 and in year 2 is often higher but not that bad.  It is in year 3 and beyond that the price tags gets huge and then most times you can restructure to keep them for a year longer.  So really year 4 is the killer year for most huge contracts.  At that point for Norman he will be 32 and for a corner that is really pretty old unless they are still fast or have other intangibles to make up for it.  We can afford whoever we want as long as the guaranteed money is not too big.  Hurney's contracts were not bad just because of the total money so much as they had so much guaranteed money that it created a ton of dead cap space and we couldn't unload them.  A guy like Norman could get a big contract but unless it has a lot of guaranteed money, he likely won't see all of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no coincidence our run game got better when he came back. He's replacable but if he'll stay for peanuts no reason not to keep him.

Oh, I thought it was bc Stewart was running for more yards than any RB in the NFL during that stretch.

And we would line up a TE to lead block for him the rare times a lead blocker was used with Cam under C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I thought it was bc Stewart was running for more yards than any RB in the NFL during that stretch.

And we would line up a TE to lead block for him the rare times a lead blocker was used with Cam under C.

 

Stewart, Norwell and Turner were clearly most important in that but Tolbert was too. When we did have a lead blocker it was Tolbert and he was wayyyy more successful there than Dickson/Williams were while Tolbert was hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
    • Taylor Moton also slipped and missed his block entirely  The oline”s performance was less than stellar in the 4th qtr
×
×
  • Create New...