Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cris Carter on RW contract


unicar15

Recommended Posts

"Take less money and take care of Lynch and others so your team can continue to be great."

Cris...please call a certain QB in the 704 area code.

It wouldn't shock me at all if Wilson does this. I have a harder time seeing Cam doing it but if

he cares at all about winning he won't let the Seahawks gain this upper hand and will give us a team friendly deal. If all he cares about is the money...he'll hold us up for a massive contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Take less money and take care of Lynch and others so your team can continue to be great."

Cris...please call a certain QB in the 704 area code.

It wouldn't shock me at all if Wilson does this. I have a harder time seeing Cam doing it but if

he cares at all about winning he won't let the Seahawks gain this upper hand and will give us a team friendly deal. If all he cares about is the money...he'll hold us up for a massive contract.

What about Cam makes you think he's less likely to make a team-first move like that? If anything, I'd say Cam's endeavors in sponsorship and other things (Bell) outside of football show that he's savvy enough to capitalize on other revenue streams and that he understands winning will make those increase exponentially.

Now, no one expects a ridiculous discount, but I could see a QB in this situation sacrificing a couple million a year (say, $17MM vs. $22MM) in salary to this end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's much easier to talk about less money when its not your money.  Chris Carter should take less money so the makeup artist, camera guy, boom operator, etc can make more money. 

 

Market value is what Cam deserves, Market value is what he should get.  Period end of.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Cam makes you think he's less likely to make a team-first move like that? If anything, I'd say Cam's endeavors in sponsorship and other things (Bell) outside of football show that he's savvy enough to capitalize on other revenue streams and that he understands winning will make those increase exponentially.

Now, no one expects a ridiculous discount, but I could see a QB in this situation sacrificing a couple million a year (say, $17MM vs. $22MM) in salary to this end.

 

$17 mil, huh?

 

That's what you think he'll settle for? :startle:

 

PS: Love how the OP made a thread regarding Cam and his disposition toward the Panthers and his contract, though Carter said/knows nothing of how Russell Wilson feels.

 

If anything, it sounds like Carter knows, Wilson's not the one that stirs the drink in Seattle, but doesn't want to call him out like that directly, so said what he said. So I'm not exactly sure what the relation was with Cam to the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Cam makes you think he's less likely to make a team-first move like that? If anything, I'd say Cam's endeavors in sponsorship and other things (Bell) outside of football show that he's savvy enough to capitalize on other revenue streams and that he understands winning will make those increase exponentially.

Now, no one expects a ridiculous discount, but I could see a QB in this situation sacrificing a couple million a year (say, $17MM vs. $22MM) in salary to this end.

 

Because Russell Wilson is so articulate, such a high character guy, very intelligent, blah blah blah blah.

 

You know the real reason, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Cam makes you think he's less likely to make a team-first move like that? If anything, I'd say Cam's endeavors in sponsorship and other things (Bell) outside of football show that he's savvy enough to capitalize on other revenue streams and that he understands winning will make those increase exponentially.

Now, no one expects a ridiculous discount, but I could see a QB in this situation sacrificing a couple million a year (say, $17MM vs. $22MM) in salary to this end.

It's not necessarily a negative about Cam's demeanor it's more of a positive outlook to RW...the guy is just different from other players. His postgame interview after he threw that pass was incredible from a maturity standpoint.

The reason I think Cam is less likely is because there is a standard for former #1s and the fact that throughout this year we heard about Cam wanting 100+ million for this contract.

The argument about Seattle having players who need to get paid and Car not is dumb. Keuchly, Star, KK off the top of my head are all guys who will be in the top 2-3 FAs at their position. So...we have guys we are gonna want to resign. We are also going to have positions we want to upgrade.

All I'm saying is that in the salary cap era you see guys like Brady, Roethlisberger and others working with their team to consistently make them contenders. Wilson will be no different IMO and Cam COULD do the same but the banter during the offseason seemed like he was going to hold our feet to the fire. You want DG to build this team to compete with the Hawks...give him money and I guarantee he'll do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please take less money so we can continue to surround you with garbage.

They had 4 years to take advantage of a QB on a cheap contract and failed to do so. Carolina can pay him or someone else will.

There's guys on Seattle that deserve big time contracts before RW, can't say that about the team in Carolina.

 

Would agree about Cam if I thought Carolina had any intention of continuing to surround him with garbage, but that's clearly not the case. Do agree about Seatlle.

 

It's much easier to talk about less money when its not your money.  Chris Carter should take less money so the makeup artist, camera guy, boom operator, etc can make more money. 

 

Market value is what Cam deserves, Market value is what he should get.  Period end of.

 

The problem is that market value wrecks salary caps, and Cam could easily make a 'discount' back and more by being on a winner.  Again, no way would he take a huge reduction under market, but if a team sells a star QB on their program and where those dollars would be going and that QB sees the bigger picture (which I believe that Cam does, given his savvy and marketability) then it is perfectly feasible to see such a QB taking a little bit less in salary to get a bigger overall return.

 

$17 mil, huh?

 

That's what you think he'll settle for? :startle:

 

PS: Love how the OP made a thread regarding Cam and his disposition toward the Panthers and his contract, though Carter said/knows nothing of how Russell Wilson feels.

 

If anything, it sounds like Carter knows, Wilson's not the one that stirs the drink in Seattle, but doesn't want to call him out like that directly, so said what he said. So I'm not exactly sure what the relation was with Cam to the OP.

 

Was just tossing that out as a general number - can't begin to guess what he would or wouldn't take and I'm totally speculating about the 'discount' as well. However, even a couple of million a year can be the difference between keeping/signing a talented player and not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would agree about Cam if I thought Carolina had any intention of continuing to surround him with garbage, but that's clearly not the case. Do agree about Seatlle.

 

 

The problem is that market value wrecks salary caps, and Cam can easily make that much back and more by being on a winner.  Again, no way would he take a huge reduction under market, but if Carolina sells him on their program and where those dollars would be going and he sees the bigger picture (which I believ that he does) then it is perfectly feasible to see him taking a little bit less in salary to get a bigger overall return.

 

 

Was just tossing that out as a general number - can't begin to guess what he would or wouldn't take and I'm totally speculating about the 'discount' as well. However, even a couple of million a year can be the difference between keeping/signing a talented player and not.

 

Kool.

 

But he ain't "settling" for a $17 mil average, especially if he has a great year.

 

If anything, it appears Newton may "settle" for a $20 mil average, and/or take more money up front for maybe a $18 or $19 mil average?

 

All speculation of course, like you. But that's my feeling, as the market will keep growing. And if Cam has a big season, he would be entitled to break the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Take less money and take care of Lynch and others so your team can continue to be great."

Cris...please call a certain QB in the 704 area code.

It wouldn't shock me at all if Wilson does this. I have a harder time seeing Cam doing it but if

he cares at all about winning he won't let the Seahawks gain this upper hand and will give us a team friendly deal. If all he cares about is the money...he'll hold us up for a massive contract.

 

the QB you speak of may be back in the 678 area code.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cams contract will be cap friendly for the first 2 years no matter what they negotiate. And after that it will be restructured like most quarterback contracts because they are so high.  By year 7 or 8 the cap will be higher and we will be able to fit his contract and others like Kuechly and Star under it as well.  It is not as big a deal as people make it out to be.  After all Newton's cap hit this year is already 14 million and we are still way under the cap after including the dead cap money and Johnson's 20 million contract for 2015. 

We will be fine.  The issue is simply the numbers at this point not the end result.  He can get a ton of money up front and we can work it into the cap.  The concern is that we might not be able to afford him in 5 years from now but that is a long way off.  Lets see if we have rings by then or we could be moving on anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...