Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which two round scenario appeals more to you?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

B, I like Peat, limitations in pass pro worry me some, but I have that worry with pretty much every tackle this year and Smith is just a perfect deep threat which we need so badly. Not only is he fast but he tracks the ball amazingly when it's in the air and will then go up and get it.

I don't like Strong, especially in the 1st so that ones out although I do like Fisher quite a bit.

Ogbeuhi is pretty much going to be red shirting as he would miss probably all of camp and Shaq's position on our team plays 30% of the snaps so you're basically getting almost no production next year for our top 2 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A.  Strong and Fisher are both great prospects.  Peat would be great, but Devin Smith potentially has a limited role (I've watched lots of breakdown videos of him, not highlights, and he mostly just seems good for the deep ball...I want more than a 1 trick pony out of our 2nd round pick).  I like Shaq well enough, but not as our first pick.  Would be fine trading up for him in the 2nd (using other picks from this year, not next year's picks), and I'd be good with Ogbuehi in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A.

I really want another 6' receiver opposite KB. (But a faster one) Also, like many, I like the fact Fisher has experience protecting a mobile QB. I wouldn't be totally opposed to option B, but option C would bother me. I don't believe Shaq and Cedric would contribute much. I would be happier with either in the second round though. But we need to get a day one starter with our first round pick if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...