Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen not worried about the offense and redzone


panthers55

Recommended Posts

A lot has been made about how the offense is struggling and for example they have struggled in the red zone. Olsen helps put this in perspective and said essentially what I said a few days ago.  This was just the first install of the redzone offense and there is no game planning at all. As he correctly points out, redzone offense is heavily situational  and changes from week to week.  There is way too much chicken little posting for the 5th day off training camp when they have had little work in pads, IMO.  And yes if they are struggling in week 5 then it is a serious issue.  But that still doesn't make the complainers correct  it simply means we didn't improve from training camp to the regular season.

 

"It was our first of install for red zone," Olsen said. "Red zone is such a week-by-week specific part of the game. It’s so game-plan oriented. You are going to have days where it just doesn’t match up. That’s something that sometimes comes with early camp installations (where there isn’t any game-planning). And when you are playing against a good defense, it’s hard enough. But we’ll be fine."

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Five-practice-observations-Day-5/2072bedb-c1d8-44fa-a9fc-2f0e89fab677

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense rest on Oherr and the Left Tackle position.  That's whether red zone or not.

No it doesnt.  One player even the left tackle is not the reason we will struggle or not.  we can gameplan to help out whoever plays that position and likely run more to the right side which is typically where you have your big maulers anyway.  As for passing in the redzone, those plays are typically quick hitters, lobs and screens anyway so an offensive guy doesnt have to hold off defenders for more than 3 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't and won't trust the offense in the red zone until something gives...cough cough Shula.

We have the talent, and hopefully adding some more pieces will help execution.  But play-calling was mind-numbing for much of last year, which helped Gano's numbers, but not a lot else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear Greg, and I want to believe him, but our team has been pretty poor at converting from the red zone for a while now.

 

Yeah that happens when you don't have good personnel at many spots.  The redzone just magnifies the issues since the defense can pack it in and you have less room to operate.  The problem has been the offense in general.  With the new additions and continued experience I think it will be different this year and going forward as we no longer have the worst offense in the league which is what was universally said about us last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on the offense.

We turned over half our starters on offense between the start of the 2013 season and the start of 2014.  Then during 2014, we turned over the offense some more, with 4 more new starters playing by the end of the season. Four of these new 2014 starters were rookies, and several others (Cotchery, Avant, Remmers) all were new to the Panthers..   We only have 4-5 starters on Offense who were starters or EVEN ON THE TEAM back in 2013.  Cam, Olsen, Kalil & Tolbert.  (Also Stewart sort of counts, though DWill was the listed starter.)

By contrast, for 2015, we'll be likely be starting 10 - 11 returning starters on offense, with only Oher and Funchess being the likely new guys at this point. (I think D. Williams will eventually start, but perhaps not right away.)

I think this continuity will be a factor in a significantly improved offense.  At this point, it's just my wishful thinking, but I hope I'm right.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seriously? A CB who missed all that time on his rookie deal and was also a top 10 pick when the guys picked right before and after have been studs. A RB our GMs tried to replace with FAs and 2nd rounders and two backup level players is one of the best drafts we’ve ever had? I’d argue that the 2011/2012 drafts were better even with just Cam and Luke/Norman. Here’s the drafts I think were better: 2017, maybe 2018, 2015, 2013, 2011, 2012, 2008, 2007, 2001, 2002 (just Pepp) I’m hoping 2025 is way better as well. Honestly, we’ve kind of sucked at drafting overall and that’s the only reason you can even remotely call Horn, Hubbard, Tremble and BC a good draft let alone one of our best ever. Good teams that draft well would laugh at that as a great draft. If you want to look at say the 2023 Lions draft, you’d get 4 stud/above average/average starters not just 3 replaceable starters/backups and a top 10 pick that missed half his games. That’s a draft that helps turn a team into a playoff team. Our record since our 2021 draft is 19-49. A best ever draft doesn’t go 19-49.
    • I remember when football was great.    Wasn't this century.  
    • Bingo. You can't pay that type of player elite franchise QB money. That average starter type player can excel when he's surrounded by top shelf talent in a great offensive system but pay him elite QB money and you're going to really struggle to surround him with the type of talent you need to carry him. You pay those elite franchise QBs because they can carry your roster. You can't pay guys who have to be carried. Bryce showed glimpses down the stretch last year. I really hope he keeps building on that. But before we back up the Brinks truck he needs to show that he's the type of QB who can lift up and carry the offense because when you pay those guys that's what they're gonna have to do.
×
×
  • Create New...