Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like Panthers have signed WR Kevin Norwood


mario

Recommended Posts

looking to Seattle for WR help is like looking to Carolina for WR help.'

If Gettlemen keeps this dude and cuts Boykin?  I know where I will devote my "what do I do now that DeAngelo is gone" posting too....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he missed time in training camp as a rookie with a foot injury and went onto make only nine catches in nine games that season. He was inactive for several games – including the Super Bowl – even when he was healthy. Norwood made only two catches for 18 yards in three preseason games – including none Friday night against San Diego – despite playing more snaps (77) than any other Seahawks receiver.

http://mynorthwest.com/292/2803492/Report-Seahawks-release-former-fourthround-pick-Kevin-Norwood

Well, that doesn't sound too enticing......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good college pedigree at least. Won 3 championships while at Bama. Drafted in the 4th round. 6'2. 

I mean everyone was screaming for WR help but you had to realize that we weren't going after any big name guys. It's Gettleman we're talking about here. Let's see what the guy can do before we all start sarcastic chants of "superb owl" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...