Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Star, no Luke for 2nd half, D could be better overall...still #1 scoring defense in league right now


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Chew on that for a second. With 3 games left for Week 1, the Panthers are the only team to hold their opponent to single digits. That despite the fact we were missing 2 beasts (although we gave up 0 anyway without Luke) and I think all of us spotted plenty of ways the D can improve going into Week 2.

 

That should bring a smile to your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only team I see possibly doing better is the Vikings but I still don't anticipate it. Looking like we will be the #1 D for week 1 and damn I'm happy about it. Hoping Shaq can have more of an impact as well after this no-show. Also, Ealy was pretty terrible today, hopefully he'll get better as the season goes on. And of course as you mentioned Luke and Star out. Seriously though.... Imagine if we had Hardy right now... Would be the best D in the history of the league with him and everyone else healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's hold our horses just one sec, it was the jags after all.  Of course, I already know our defense is better than last year.

Hold our horses? Half the "experts" thought the Jags were going to drop 20+ on our defense.

poo, Marc Sessler of NFL.com thought Bortles was going to throw 3 TDs on our D.

I'm not holding any horses, I'm riding those fugers like JNo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold our horses? Half the "experts" thought the Jags were going to drop 20+ on our defense.

poo, Marc Sessler of NFL.com thought Bortles was going to throw 3 TDs on our D.

I'm not holding any horses, I'm riding those fugers like JNo.

Of course those same experts will act as though they said nothing of the sort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I'm happy with the win of course and not trying to be a debbie downer, but I have to say that this is all good and well but it's like our "dominance" at the end of last year.  Until we play a legit team, I'm going to stay happy about the individual battles won but not convinced it is indicative of how the war's going.

Technicality, but Ravens would be tied with us in addition to Denver being ahead.  Both of those teams scored defensive TDs

Yea, I hate when people try to count defensive touchdowns into the total score when considering points allowed by a defense (the other defense, of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...