Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The "debate" taking over NFL social media of 2015 Cam vs. 2015 Kaepernick is breaking me, I'm seriously going mental


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Y'all...I'm about to give up the Internet entirely except for the Huddle. Everywhere I turn today, Facebook, Twitter, NFL sites......everyone is weighing in on 2015 MVP candidate Cam Newton vs. 2015 "benched for Blaine Gabbert" Colin Kaepernick.

 

I don't think I've ever been so annoyed about some Panthers discussion in my entire life. Are these people just Panther-hating trolls? What the fug is going on here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people on the internet are honestly looking at that little graphic some dbag put together w/ CAM and KAP and thinks KAP is better, or hell even if they think they are equal, these people haven't watched a panthers game and have absolutely no clue on the brand of football we play here in the Carolina's.  Our 53 don't care about stats, they want to WIN.  Bottom line.  Don't let it bother ya so much man.  We're 7-0 and I couldn't be happier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares. Let's face it, and I have said this several times over the last couple of days. People are always going to hate the Panthers. And Cam. It's a weird hate though...not like the hate for the cowboys or the raiders. This seems to be a real hatred of the team. I hate the the other nfcs teams, but mostly for play on the field. 

NFL fans have a deep hate for us and it's about time the team and fans embrace it and become the Big Bad Cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

And it's an article that says it all. Of course if you're a football fan with half a brain, you don't even need to read it to know the reality of the situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...