Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which undefeated team will go undefeated?


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

According to the guys over at NFL(dot)com.

 

The Panthers have the easiest schedule left, with the strength of schedule...

 

 

Are they aware that the Pats and the Bengals actually have an easier SOS? Or am I wrong in believing that?

Just last week on the broadcast they showed us having the hardest SOS of the undefeated at .522

Since then, all the other NFCS teams lost and we beat GB, so that may account for the change.

Not sure it is very meaningful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

I dont' care at all about going undefeated. I just want home field and that lombardi... doesn't matter how many losses we have as long as we get those

I don't believe that. Everybody wants their team to go undefeated. 19-0 is definitely better than 18-1 (winning the Super Bowl, with the loss in the regular season of course, not like the Pats' 18-1) or 17-2 or 16-3, etc. It would be the best season of any team in NFL history. Of course it's not likely for that to happen but fans have every right to root for that, and should. I agree of course that winning it all is the most important and going 16-0 in the regular season and losing in the playoffs is worse than going 14-2 and winning it all, but you gotta root for the 19-0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Marguide said:

Just last week on the broadcast they showed us having the hardest SOS of the undefeated at .522

Since then, all the other NFCS teams lost and we beat GB, so that may account for the change.

Not sure it is very meaningful.

The .522 was an erroneous graphic, it was accounting for Green Bay as a remaining opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I don't believe that. Everybody wants their team to go undefeated. 19-0 is definitely better than 18-1 (winning the Super Bowl, with the loss in the regular season of course, not like the Pats' 18-1) or 17-2 or 16-3, etc. It would be the best season of any team in NFL history. Of course it's not likely for that to happen but fans have every right to root for that, and should. I agree of course that winning it all is the most important and going 16-0 in the regular season and losing in the playoffs is worse than going 14-2 and winning it all, but you gotta root for the 19-0.

believe what you want, but going undefeated is too much pressure. It won't bother me at all if we lose a game or two and win the super bowl. I'm looking at the big picture 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

believe what you want, but going undefeated is too much pressure. It won't bother me at all if we lose a game or two and win the super bowl. I'm looking at the big picture 

Look at how this team under Ron has performed under pressure... I'm looking at the big picture as well. Dynasty. Greatest of all time. 19-0 to start off this dynasty man. At least 3-4 Super Bowls total, maybe even a couple 19-0 seasons. Any time these Patriots, Steelers, Cowboys toolbag fans try to talk sh*t we'd be able to one up those motherfugers. Bragging rights for life. Strive for the fuging greatest not just another 1 and done type team like the Seahawks are becoming or the Bucs and Aints were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Look at how this team under Ron has performed under pressure... I'm looking at the big picture as well. Dynasty. Greatest of all time. 19-0 to start off this dynasty man. At least 3-4 Super Bowls total, maybe even a couple 19-0 seasons. Any time these Patriots, Steelers, Cowboys toolbag fans try to talk sh*t we'd be able to one up those motherfugers. Bragging rights for life. Strive for the fuging greatest not just another 1 and done type team like the Seahawks are becoming or the Bucs and Aints were.

fug yeah!

tumblr_lrhe1xx0xd1r2mb8io1_500.gif.01924

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...