Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know this is a hypothetical question. How much would this offense change with KB?


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

Seeing how great the offense is doing. I just have this question, would the offense be as efficient or resilient as it currently is with Kelvin Benjamin?

 

Logic suggests it would be better. 

 

Cam Newton has progressed so much and I believe part of it is that he doesn't have his other BFF to throw to, KB. This has kind of forced Cam to rely on his other receivers besides Greg Olsen. It has taught him to spread that ball around and find the open man. I don't believe one of our WR's has reached 100 yards yet. 

 

I am not sure if it would be better as much as different. The offense without KB had to adapt. Shula and Cam had to literally evolve and think outside the box. Another note is that this is the most I've seen Cam audible in his career. He's dissecting defenses and he's taking what they give him. Most of the time it's some really long explosive plays which boasts well for the offense.  

 

Would Cam rely more and more on KB? Would he force throws to KB, leading to more INTs? Or would their chemistry just be too good that it would not matter? Would this team be averaging this many points? Would it be more or less?

 

So many questions and variables...

 

Lost in dreamland this morning. Thinking about how much different this offense would be with a year 2, Healthy, KB. :D

 

 

 

Edit:

 

I realized that maybe I did not phrase the question correctly. There is no doubt it would be better but how much would it change?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were definitely times this year we could have used KB in multiple scenarios.  He would take the pressure off Olsen big time thus opening up the passing game even more.  If Fun Fun can keep progressing, KB back and Olsen still killing it....my god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be much better.  I've heard that KB being out made Cam better, in a way maybe it did, but you can't say losing a guy like KB helps.  The requirement of the defense to give him attention at the minimum would help.  I think our issue last year was lack speed.  Ginn and Brown (who didn't really get time till end of last season) bring that.  If we had the combo of them with KB's size/toughness and Cotchery/Funchess, we'd be much better.  It would be way harder to defend Olsen as well when KB is out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to play Devil's advocate here.  Personally, I do think we'd be better, but I'm not completely sure.

KB is a MAN.  He was killing it in TC.  He looked like his star was about to explode, but then he went down, and we had to modify the heck out of everything.

Cam has been forced to read the entire field, and try to build rapport with different receivers who are no where near as good as KB is on a bad day.  He's thrown to 88 a lot, duh, but he's also spread the ball around to a bunch of different guys.  I think that has made him a better QB.

Gameplan, we have developed one of the most sophisticated running attacks in the NFL.  Despite everyone knowing we're going to run the ball, they can't really do that much about it.  It's because of Cam, and the fact that we do a lot more with our running game than just line up and hit the guys in front of us.  

So I think that because it forced us to do different things and find success it's made us better.  But then again, I'm also an idiot on line...

I do absolutely think that KB will open our offense more.  Having a true big play WR again will be HUGE for us and Cam.  It happened, and Cam has been better because of it.  So I'm pretty pleased there. 2016 could be an extremely big year for our offense!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main place you'd see the difference would be in the red zone.

right now the Panthers are 10th in the league in TD percentage in the red zone, which isn't bad. However, adding Kelvin into that mix would be a huge boon. They really don't have anyone to take the heat off olsen inside the ten, and even he can't really sky like Kelvin can.

KB has really bizarre physical proportions that few in the NFL can match. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have certainly missed him, but probably not as much as we will miss him in the playoffs.

 

When they don't call holding as much, and Ginn and Philly are getting re-routed, when it's cold as hell and you need bigger hands to hold the ball after the catch, when it's all on the line and you need a TD from the 9 yard line....that's when we will miss KB.

But to answer the questions:  KB being out has hurt our offense.  KB being out has helped our QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...