Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

friday morning schadenfreude


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

even though i am spectacularly loaded down with work and deadlines and other responsibilities i couldn't stop myself from spending copious amounts of time browsing the cowboys-panthers gameday thread over on the dallas boards. there's a special little joy in going page by page and anticipating reactions to big plays and seeing spontaneous rushes of curse words and unadulterated rage. here's a sampling

 

565855396557b_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.355658554080275_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.36565855475da9d_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.375658554c1f10a_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.4056585565532ca_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.435658556b761e4_ScreenShot2015-11-26at9.4956585602aa096_ScreenShot2015-11-26at10.05658560621aed_ScreenShot2015-11-26at10.05658560c84a3a_ScreenShot2015-11-26at10.15658561379e3e_ScreenShot2015-11-26at10.15658561da3500_ScreenShot2015-11-26at10.2

 

 

 

this is the most beautiful thing that could've possibly happened. my grandchildren's grandchildren will hear about this one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thebigcat said:

Ref bias? Lol

In his defense, there were two plays that could've easily have resulted in flags and first downs for Dallas.

1) TD hitting McFadden before the ball got there resulting in a 3rd down which ended up leading to a FG

2) On Kuechly's second INT Coleman just about took Witten's head off during a time where Witten was a defenseless receiver. 

I really thought the refs called a good game and let the guys play. Brandon Carr basically undressed Olsen on his catch down the seam to end the 1st as well but Olsen fought him off and made the grab. I way rather the refs let them play versus flag every second play. If the refs were really out to get Carolina then they definitely missed their chance yesterday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

In his defense, there were two plays that could've easily have resulted in flags and first downs for Dallas.

1) TD hitting McFadden before the ball got there resulting in a 3rd down which ended up leading to a FG

2) On Kuechly's second INT Coleman just about took Witten's head off during a time where Witten was a defenseless receiver. 

I really thought the refs called a good game and let the guys play. Brandon Carr basically undressed Olsen on his catch down the seam to end the 1st as well but Olsen fought him off and made the grab. I way rather the refs let them play versus flag every second play. If the refs were really out to get Carolina then they definitely missed their chance yesterday

Yeah, I was also shocked that Coleman didn't get a 15 yard personal foul for decleating Witten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coleman hit Witten in the chest, that's why they didn't call it.  He did leave his feet and it was very close to being a helmet to helmet shot but it was by rule a clean hit although on the razors edge of a penalty.  I was surprised it wasn't called a foul anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

In his defense, there were two plays that could've easily have resulted in flags and first downs for Dallas.

1) TD hitting McFadden before the ball got there resulting in a 3rd down which ended up leading to a FG

2) On Kuechly's second INT Coleman just about took Witten's head off during a time where Witten was a defenseless receiver. 

I really thought the refs called a good game and let the guys play. Brandon Carr basically undressed Olsen on his catch down the seam to end the 1st as well but Olsen fought him off and made the grab. I way rather the refs let them play versus flag every second play. If the refs were really out to get Carolina then they definitely missed their chance yesterday

On #2, Mike Pereria said that there is no foul for launching in the NFL, and a better angle shows that he didn't hit the head/neck or shoulder area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

In his defense, there were two plays that could've easily have resulted in flags and first downs for Dallas.

1) TD hitting McFadden before the ball got there resulting in a 3rd down which ended up leading to a FG

2) On Kuechly's second INT Coleman just about took Witten's head off during a time where Witten was a defenseless receiver.

I really thought the refs called a good game and let the guys play. Brandon Carr basically undressed Olsen on his catch down the seam to end the 1st as well but Olsen fought him off and made the grab. I way rather the refs let them play versus flag every second play. If the refs were really out to get Carolina then they definitely missed their chance yesterday

#2 was a legal (and nasty) hit.

#1 should have been PI, not to mention the replay showed Luke trip him man on the same play. Oh well, the Panther's were definitely due for a call or two to go their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

In his defense, there were two plays that could've easily have resulted in flags and first downs for Dallas.

1) TD hitting McFadden before the ball got there resulting in a 3rd down which ended up leading to a FG

2) On Kuechly's second INT Coleman just about took Witten's head off during a time where Witten was a defenseless receiver. 

I really thought the refs called a good game and let the guys play. Brandon Carr basically undressed Olsen on his catch down the seam to end the 1st as well but Olsen fought him off and made the grab. I way rather the refs let them play versus flag every second play. If the refs were really out to get Carolina then they definitely missed their chance yesterday

That TD hit on McFadden was legitimately one of the worst no calls I've ever seen. Even live it was really clear TD was there way too early.

That said, given the terrible calls that have gone against us this it's about time some of the terrible reffing went our way. I also think we would still hold them to a FG there if they did get the call so whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jangler said:

For anybody having a hard time with the title

 

 

 

I'm assuming this is supposed to be funny, since that's not even close to being correct.

 

4 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

What's even better is going to the Falcons and saints board. They are legit scared of this team.

They should be. We just keep getting better, and if our Rivera December performance continues this year, the odds of finishing the season 16-0 go way up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...