Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrell Davis says we finish 14-2


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Heard him talking on the NFL Network, was asked how the Panthers would finish the season and he said we will lose to the Giants because they are "giant killers" and will lose to the Bucs because our starters will be resting. 

Personally I don't see us losing to the Giants, their defense stinks and Norman will shut down Beckham. It's possible if Ron rests the guys against the Bucs that we lose... that's the only way we lose that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

16-0 puts you in awfully rare air.

That's history books stuff.....if we slip by ATL X 2, and NYFG's, I say RR and Co. make a run at it.

I agree. Right now they say they're not looking at 16-0 cuz they look at the next game, but if we're 15-0 you best believe they're looking for 16-0 and I can't see Ron taking away that opportunity from the guys who will surely want to be a part of history. These guys are competitors and next to winning the superbowl most players dream about going undefeated.

Plus, we will have the bye and i think having three weeks in between a game would hurt more than it would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ron is keeping them focused on the next game as part of his overall strategy to manage the team.  But he was a part of the 85 bears that went 15-1 with only one loss.   That team wanted to go undefeated in a big way.  If we get the opportunity to be undefeated by winning the next 3 games I hope he will not rest anyone and give the team every opportunity to finish out 16-0.  He couldnt do it as a player but would like to do it as a coach. Now next year he might relent and rest some folks when we are undefeated again, 

Then again he said on Black and Blue report yesterday that  he might rest them  because going undefeated doesnt matter if you lose in the playoffs because someone got hurt.  But he was also a member of the 2009 Chargers that lost 3 games but rested their starters in the last game and were rusty after an essentially 3 week break. So he appears to have conflicting thoughts at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Publix has played well against bad defenses, but his numbers are kind of crabby against solid D's.  Do people forget how he fared the first time he faced us?  Yes, he's played more games since then (more experience), but our defense is playing much better than that game as well.  We will beat Tampa Bay like they stole something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see resting starters week 17 with the bye coming up. If we do that, then come divisional round the panthers will have taken the field for the first time in three weeks. Not exactly the adjustment you want to make against a rabid team that just won a playoff game the week before. Limit snaps to guys like Stewart and others who carry a workload if you must but I want these guys to be as sharp as possible for the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrell has been a non-believer since the hooplah about the Panthers began. He thought we were the worst undefeated team each time one undefeated went down. Not that I get all butt-hurt over what he thinks because I'm sure many of us see the Giants game as a possible loss, mostly due to PTSD of Panthers games past. That said, I can't shake the feeling from previous seasons and am worried before every game, but if I weren't worried I wouldn't care to watch and so far i've only missed two or three games the past 5 years (since the Jimmy Clausen days and finally having my own apartment and TV). 

Before then even in 2003 when I went to the Lions game and heard some guy parading up the stands yelling, "We going to Houston!!" for three hours, I looked at my dad as an 11 year old and said, yeah right. 

So skeptical, yes. Therefor I can't fault others for being skeptical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the right price… but if they did they would be pulling a Tepper, because they are trying to evaluate Shough and taking his best WR away is making it hard on him. 
    • see we are just not going to agree - unless you change your mind lol. Mine isn’t changing without hard evidence that Morgan supported it like a puppy dog.  He was the assistant. If he disagreed and said so, and they didn’t listen, he has to pick his battles. If he continued to oppose he is looking for work. He knows this stuff. I think he knows Bryce is a super long shot just because he faced NFL QBs and probably would have salivated at the thought of Bryce on the other side in his playing days.  Anyway I am going to judge him on what he has done since he’s been the man with the title.  I also would bet a stack that there were conditions placed on him and on Canales re Bryce Young. Can’t prove it. I am not supporting the Brooks pick, and rationalizing the XL pick. And rationalizing the Brooks pick to an extent, on the (assumed by me) mandate that was a condition of the hiring. Which was ‘sell out’ to make Bryce work. This year. Now. (2024) That is what those top two picks were.  IMO. They failed, id judged today.  I think Morgan is doing a great job really, once he got his feet under him and was allowed to do his job.  Fixing this team while accommodating Tepper/Bryce, more than a two year fix.    Anyhow I have beer to drink will check back later. 
    • Dolphins pass rushers Bradley Chubb and Jaelan Phillips: The Dolphins have received trade interest for both players, but could have an easier time trading Matthew Judon due to his more affordable contract
×
×
  • Create New...