Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who was at fault?


UKPanther94

Recommended Posts

Back in spring it seemed like the organisation made a big effort in overhauling the special teams corps after a dismal 2014 season and brought in a lot of ST specialists and changed the coach with DeHaven taking over for Rodgers. Yet, special teams were never that great this season, punt coverages were always sloppy, Teddy Williams seemed to get a penalty every other play. Even with Ginn back we never really got much going in the kick returns and the only time he took it to the house it got called back for a penalty. Not to mention the field goal team that managed to get several kicks blocked throughout the year.

Yeah we went 15-1 so this is somewhat overstated but ultimately this was one of the biggest reasons why we lost the Superbowl, against a team like Denver that couldnt move the ball but were elite on defense we simply had to win the special teams/field position battles, instead we always got pinned back inside our 20 while Denver always seemed to get better starting position and thats even before taking that complete failure of a 61 yard return into consideration.

Who takes responsibility for it. Gettleman for apparently not bringing the right guys in (arguably the only thing he hasn't nailed so far), the coaching staff for not utilising the players properly or merely just a case of individual mistakes from the players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every NFL team has a weakness, and unfortunately Special Teams is the weakness for the Panthers.  Actually, Special Teams has been a Panthers weakness for many years.  I think it has to do with that the Panthers have been trying to build their defense and offense.....and they have not either had the money or the opportunity to dramatically improve their Special Teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot,of 'throats to choke'.  What would be the point.

i am just mind boggled by the the play selection in this game

the average time to get the ball  out of a QBs hands is 4 seconds so the metrics go

looked like those plays were taking 5 seconds 

the oline had the Denver Dline in its face in the backfield in about 3

you could surmise the Broncos are just that good, the protection was that bad or they picked up on the snap count. Either it was ugly

it is almost as if they didn't game play for that Dline at all. Sadly

dave needs to up his spending limit or the best of Newton's years gone 

newton took quite a beating . Someone said at halftime he almost went to Denvers locker room 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thennek said:

Every NFL team has a weakness, and unfortunately Special Teams is the weakness for the Panthers.  Actually, Special Teams has been a Panthers weakness for many years.  I think it has to do with that the Panthers have been trying to build their defense and offense.....and they have not either had the money or the opportunity to dramatically improve their Special Teams.  

I know it probably isn't true but I feel like we haven't had a good special teams since we had Michael Bates returning kicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They sucked all year so it should surprise no one that they would let us down in the biggest game of the year.  Day one of next years practice maybe we should work on how to recognize what a fair catch signal does or does not look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stankowalski said:

I know it probably isn't true but I feel like we haven't had a good special teams since we had Michael Bates returning kicks.

Yeah I miss those Michael Bates days on Special Teams.  When the football was in his hands, I always felt he could take it to the house.  

I do remember in 2008 the Panthers had pretty good Special Teams with Mark Jones as both the PR and KR.  He was not fast or showy, but very effective.  He played for like one season for the Panthers, and then they let him go.  I don't think the Panthers have had a good Special Teams unit since.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman gets the bulk of the blame for the OT, RB depth, and WR failures.

Shula gets blame for not protecting the offense against their weaknesses. Instead he played to their weaknesses, which were made worse since they also played to the Broncos strengths. Should have played to the Panthers offensive strengths and attacked the Broncos weaknesses. Not sure what they were thinking when they were putting together the game plan.

Then it goes to the players. I will say the players should have never been put into these positions and expected to win. Remmers, Oher, and Fozzy were exploited in blocking matchups against Von Miller and Demarcus Ware in one on one match ups. They were trying to play physical against man to man with their WRs. Ginn, Brown, and Cotchery are not physical WRs. The WR that should have been leaned on for physical man to man matchups would have been Devin Funchess. Since they were playing man to man the receivers needed to work the crossing patterns with their speed while stretching the field with one other receiver and Olsen. The sideline to sideline routes were wins almost all the time as the Panthers receivers could run away from the Broncos DBs and take away their angles. The down field vertical routes and curl routes were a waste as they played to the Broncos strength.

Domino effect. OTs failed in one on one match ups. Led to Cam not having time to develop the routes for the WRs. Threw off timing for receivers and they dropped a lot of balls they were not ready for as Cam had to throw the ball sooner than he wanted to. Some of the passes Cam tried to take a little more time as he let the receivers use their speed, but he trusted his protection and Shula had a horrible plan for pass protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...