Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derrick Henry Making Eddie Lacy Look Small


beastson

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, davos said:

Well then to be technical, he's closer to 6'3 than 6'2 then :)

It's still 6'2 though. Cam is like 6'5 7/8ths which is like the dumbest poo. Still listed at 6'5. And as such 6'2 will be his listed height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CatMan72 said:

Sports Science episode today said Henry had the fastest acceleration of any player in the draft for the last 3 years.

Any player that has been on a Sports Science episode. So that's probably about 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Stewart is a lot smaller and he still made Seattle his bitch. Size is overrated.

Nah, size is definitely not overrated in the nfl. Bigger stronger faster.

Plus stewart is not a small running back at all, he is built like a freight train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Reminds me of Hershel Walker.  That was a big SOB or the Nigerian Nightmare Christina Okoye.

Hershel Walker would probably be a top 10 pick right now but Henry's abilities are definitely first round type. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand the devaluation of the RB position, let's think a little bit about the Gettleman philosophy:  Big Men let you compete.  Also, there is something called the global theory in that there are few people of a given size who can do certain things.  Does Henry fall into that?

If Gman believes he helps our team, then I trust him.  I can see the problems he would cause if he could play some of our Read Option brand of football.  Or simply lining up in short yardage situations with the QB sprint there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, d-dave said:

While I understand the devaluation of the RB position, let's think a little bit about the Gettleman philosophy:  Big Men let you compete.  Also, there is something called the global theory in that there are few people of a given size who can do certain things.  Does Henry fall into that?

If Gman believes he helps our team, then I trust him.  I can see the problems he would cause if he could play some of our Read Option brand of football.  Or simply lining up in short yardage situations with the QB sprint there...

The short yardage thing is what I'm concerned with.  Without the help of a supremely talented offensive line, does Henry have the 1st step explosion to get that tough 1-1.5 yards when you need it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...