Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanchez: I wouldn't call myself a gambler (via Joe Person's latest)


top dawg

Recommended Posts

From ball field to the gridiron, our new corner is supremely confident in his ability to make plays, and to his credit he made plenty during his last couple of seasons at Oklahoma.

http://www.wbtv.com/story/31917211/panthers-rookie-zack-sanchez-not-ready-for-josh-norman-comparisons

 

He doesn't believe he's a gambler.

Quote

 

After redshirting as a freshman, Sanchez became a three-year starter for the Sooners and earned a reputation as a ball-hawk – and as a player who was not afraid to take some chances going after the ball.

After drafting Sanchez last week, Gettleman said: “He’s instinctive, he’s smart, and yes, he’s a gambler.”

But Sanchez believes that’s a loaded word.

“I wouldn’t call myself a gambler. If I was that good a gambler I’d probably be a poker player right now,” said Sanchez, who had 13 interceptions his final two years at Oklahoma.

“I think it’s a little more preparation than people think – my instincts and my ability to dissect things and read things before they happen. I think you get the gambling title when you jump something a little too early and you get beat.”

Sanchez says those times he was beaten in coverage had more to do with sloppy technique than shirking his responsibility and jumping a route. But he readily admits he needs to improve as a tackler, which is a prerequisite for corners in defensive coordinator Sean McDermott’s system.


 

One thing though, there just might be a correlation between getting beat and taking risks. Just saying. The good thing is that he is not only ready to tackle the problem, but also the work and responsibilities that come with making plays in whatever capacity that the team needs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a scout and don't pretend what I think means anything whatsoever but I have a hunch that if any of these guys is to not make the team it's Sanchez. Some of his college footage is really quite bad. He does not like to tackle. It's sort of interception or nothing with him. I hope I am wrong. I am sure I am wrong, but that's just the impression I got trying to find what this guy was all about.

I hope he  plays here for 10 successful years given that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Gettleman we trust!

He sounds a bit like a recently departed CB of ours a little bit...  I love the confidence, but I hope he can get his tackling together so he can see the field.

The more I read about our draft picks, the better I feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Sanchez 4+ INTs in 2016. Y'all heard it first here

If he gets playing time then I can see it but right now he is the backup slot CB and 5th CB. Since he is a poor tackler he offers very little on ST so I doubt he even makes the active roster on game day the majority of the time without injuries which is good because he really needs a developmental year on the bench in my opinion.

If he does play he'd get the 4 picks but give up a bunch of big plays in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Been doing that for years until Norman's breakout last year

To be fair though,  Getty wants some stability in the backfield,  and that's part of the reason why he drafted three corners this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm super excited about the guys we're getting back, and fortunately this year, outside of Robert Hunt, we haven't had any season-threatening injuries. Rico has earned the start, but I am excited to have both available.  The team is finally turning into the run-first team Canales said he wanted to be. As for JT Sanders, I think he has lost the most be being out. He is probably our best receiving TE, but with the emergence of Mitchell Evans & with him and Tommy Tremble both absolutely balling in run blocking, it will be hard to fix something that isn't broken. I'm hoping Turk Wharton can help with our pass rush. We really havent gotten to see him much due to injuries, but we desperately need anyone to provide some pass rush juice, which is what he was brought to do. I'm the most excited about Jalen Coker returning. Theilen may have been the most clutch last year, but I've watched a lot of film, and Coker was the most consistent WR we had when he was out there last year.  I think he can be an ideal #2 to Tmac. While Coker doesn't have the raw athleticism XL does, his route running, savvy, and overall football IQ simply make him better.  I think with the fact Coker can play both outside and in the slot will give our pass game more versatility.  We have been running a lot of 2 TE sets, and I think Tmac & Coker should be the primary WRs for 12 personnel. The other WRs (XL, Tremayne, Renfrow, & Horn) all have roles, but I dont think any of them can fully replace what Coker can do. I do think Renfrow will be inactive this week if everyone is healthy bc of how valuable Tremayne is for ST and as a run blocker. So happy that we are playing meaningful football heading into November. We are still almost certainly a year away, but we are absolutely moving in the right direction     
    • Better than a fragile starter, though 
×
×
  • Create New...