Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Delaire Just Take A Shot At Cam?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

I think the initial onus to extend an olive branch starts with the powerful and not the powerless. So while the black community has work to do on a lot of fronts, the system and those who are it's agents (cops, politicians, etc) have to humble themselves and show change and acknowledge the depth and complexity of the issues.

I agree that when they are wrong or an injustice occurs then justice needs to be done. But what if there isn't agreement on what is justice. If the cops say their actions were justified and the black community says it isnt and wants to riot, what trumps what when the evidence isn't overwhelming one-sided. Given there is mistrust on both sides it just foments rather than heals. Like last night when the peaceful rally turns violent when supposedly  a black man gets killed by a drive by shooter who was black and no police are involved. Is anyone going to admit wrongdoing for the damage to police cars, property or the dozens of police who are supposedly hurt. How about the photographer who said several black men tried to throw him into a fire they started. Violence begets violence and both sides blame the other.  Blacks say they are targeted. Police say black suspects are more dangerous since they commit 60% of the cop shootings and resist arrest at a much higher rate than white suspects so they are wary and may jump the gun too quickly.  Both sides have facts to back them up but when only one side is held accountable it causes mistrust on both sides. Neither side is blameless and solutions need to recognize fault on both sides. That is what Cam was talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I agree that when they are wrong or an injustice occurs then justice needs to be done. But what if there isn't agreement on what is justice. If the cops say their actions were justified and the black community says it isnt and wants to riot, what trumps what when the evidence isn't overwhelming one-sided. Given there is mistrust on both sides it just foments rather than heals. Like last night when the peaceful rally turns violent when supposedly  a black man gets killed by a drive by shooter who was black and no police are involved. Is anyone going to admit wrongdoing for the damage to police cars, property or the dozens of police who are supposedly hurt. How about the photographer who said several black men tried to throw him into a fire they started. Violence begets violence and both sides blame the other.  Blacks say they are targeted. Police say black suspects are more dangerous since they commit 60% of the cop shootings and resist arrest at a much higher rate than white suspects so they are wary and may jump the gun too quickly.  Both sides have facts to back them up but when only one side is held accountable it causes mistrust on both sides. Neither side is blameless and solutions need to recognize fault on both sides. That is what Cam was talking about.

A big part of the problem, and it's expressed often, is that many people feel that there is no accountability for police when they are wrong. That is a very real perception for a lot of people, partially based on facts and partially based on emotion. People need to see change and accountability before attitudes and perceptions will start to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it as Delaire is a fringe player on our roster who would like to exercise his first amendment rights by taking a knee for the national anthem, but can't due to the fact that the organization all but said if you do that you will be cut. Sucks for guys like him, but when your livelihood is at stake, sometimes you gotta do poo you don't agree with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, arbnranger said:

Could be, good points. We may never know but still interesting.  I don't have any social media other than the Huddle so I do miss a lot of the other stuff...and it's intentional and I'm happy about it. Ha

 

Welcome to the club brother. Since I got my first cell phone around 98, I have had 3, yup 3 phones. That first phone was an Ericson piece of crap, that lasted for years. The last 2 were Verizon flip phones. I just don't see the need for one of those Smart Phone thingys. The lap top has the twitter on it, which I have never felt the need to learn. I guess I just have never felt the need to upgrade. I need to talk to someone, I call them. I will respond to a text, but rarely send one. Hellz, most times, I got nothing to say to people anyway. People tend to irritate me. I don't need no modern technology to ignore people. I can do just fine with my ol' reliable flip phone.

 

Not sure whence that came. But it felt rather calming getting it out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I can relate to that kid, it was similar for me growing up. A black kid in to things my black peers werent. I was scrutinized for it too.

Ignorance creates outcasts, my family of rednecks never understood my proclivity with computers or willingness to have black and gay friends. Probably why I ignore half of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a novel idea. Just leave sports to sports  and social issues to social issues. If a player has a stance to take, do it on your own time. There are plenty of forums on the net where one can voice opinions. Don"t drag the whole team along with you. Many might not feel the same way.....only causes problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...