Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching or Execution?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Coaching, easily.

 

The plays that are called are not fitting to the circumstances at hand. Even executed properly it isn't the right plays to be called and players would be struggling to execute properly.

Sure a 20 yard route call taking forever to develop on 3rd and 4 in the beginning of 4th quarter, or reverse COULD play out but why are you putting that stress on the players? Why are you getting all fancy and making it harder than it needs to be?  

 

Players shouldnt be be trying to force something to fit or work, call a play they can easily execute and  it being more of a matter of playing good football. Simple as that, especially when we are already struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Semaj Newbie

Semaj

Posted
Posted

Coaching has effected the execution. Coaches put us in the position we were to Denver and Minnesota, they made us play from behind and then the players pressed and made mistakes, ie Cams interceptions. We had Minnesota on their heels early and with the right coaching calls could have put them away. Players do need to be more disciplined though. Talking to Benjamin with his penalty that cost us 7. Both sides responsible but coaches more so.

Sent from my XT1575 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • strato
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By strato · Posted

      I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • kungfoodude
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...