Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera should be on the hotseat


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

I'm sorry, but anyone in favor of canning our coaches or GM right now is completely delusional.

Are we down? Absolutely.  We just don't have the same magic this season.  It happens to everyone. 

What is the gain in firing a two time coach if the year and his staff?  Who will replace him who will turn the team around?  Or will we end up another knee jerk dumpster fire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OneBadCat said:

He shouldn't be on the hotseat but he should absolutely make some changes. Where the hell is Riverboat when the game is on the line?

He damn well knows the defense isn't going to hold up when we can't get any sacks. Go for it. Show some balls Ron.

I agree go for it stop punting back to no faith in offense..which I don't truly blame but the defense is sucking just as bad..This whole team needs an overhaul.except maybe 6 players. We lost it when we lost to Denver Cam really has not been Cam since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

Absolutely no fuging excuse for this kind of a drop off.  This is about to be what, four losing seasons in 6 years?

NFL teams in 2016 might have been a bit slow in catching up to Rivera's preferred Stone Age offense and defense.

But they have.

Does Rivera have it in him to at least advance to the Bronze Age?

Or is he still going to insist on carrying around his club?  "Ugh we win on ground ugh!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...