Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legal Hit? YOU Be The Judge


Saca312

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Here is the rule. To me it was a forcible hit to the head. Untitled-1.jpg

Here's the thing how I know the refs are doing (or not doing, as it were) this poo on purpose:

The refs White Knight, Mike Pereira, in a video he posted on Twitter, defended this because he hit Cam's helmet "head up with his facemask".

And, as Igo proves above, thats just as illegal as any other helmet-to-helmet hit in the pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Manos said:

The real issue to me is that he left his feet to hit Cam like that. It was completely intentional. There was absolutely no excuse for him to do that unless his intention is to hit Cam in the head. How the fug the refs didn't see that just baffles me.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Shorter players HAVE to leave their feet for their helmets to hit a 6-5 players helmet.

Thats science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rook35200 said:

 
I think it's a clean hit, however Brady would have gotten that call. It's a shame smh

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

This.

Knowing that Brady and 4-5 other QBs in the league would have gotten the call is enough to tell me Cam or any other QB should have gotten the call.

There was enough there to call something, whether it was helmet to helmet (regardless of shoulder-led or shoulder first, the fact is it was helmet to helmet) and there was an obvious forearm to head-neck area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya'll know how i feel about how Cam's been treated, and I'm quick to jump on any potential illegal hit...  the Barron hit I had some pause on because I felt you could reason that thr helmet contact was incidental.  BUT, then i remembered, in the pocket, the rules state that there can't be ANY contact made to the head of a qb, incidental or not.  So, regardless of whether the helmet contact was incidental, it was illegal, and additionally, he also led and delivered a blow with his forearm to Cam's head.  I've seen defenders get flagged for slapping a QB's head in passing. 

I also think Donald's first hit on Cam was unintentional,but also illegal as he hit Cam below the knees.

Donald's second sack on Cam also appeared illegal, as he picked up, "speared" and drove Cam through the ground with helmet to helmet contact.

But, idk, although it was frustrating to watch, I felt like Cam was okay with it.  I really hope we start getting more calls, even iffy ones to balance things out and make defenses back off.

SN: Barron is a bitch who got knocked out as a rookie by a teammate for taking his seat.  So, lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had the radio on mike and mike while i took my daughter to the bus stop...  both mikes and louis riddick all unanimouslu said the barron hit and the last donald sack were completely illegal by today's rules and should have been called.  Said they were shocked after the amount of attention Cam had gotten over the last week in taking illegal hits and having just talked to Goodell, that these hits still took place and werent called.

They said in their jobs, watching all the other games out there, that hits far less than that draw penalties in every other game but ours.  They said now he's brought attention to it, talked to goodell, and we STILL didnt get the calls that every other qb gets, they asked what else does cam have to do to get those same calls?

Riddick said he didnt want to go down that road of questioning the refs motives or integrity, but said ever since Cam started publicly questioning the refs and Hochuli in particular, he has been allowed to take those hits other qbs dont.

This is making me angry all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Just had the radio on mike and mike while i took my daughter to the bus stop...  both mikes and louis riddick all unanimouslu said the barron hit and the last donald sack were completely illegal by today's rules and should have been called.  Said they were shocked after the amount of attention Cam had gotten over the last week in taking illegal hits and having just talked to Goodell, that these hits still took place and werent called.

They said in their jobs, watching all the other games out there, that hits far less than that draw penalties in every other game but ours.  They said now he's brought attention to it, talked to goodell, and we STILL didnt get the calls that every other qb gets, they asked what else does cam have to do to get those same calls?

Riddick said he didnt want to go down that road of questioning the refs motoves or integrity, but said ever since Cam started publicly questioning the refs and Hochuli in particular, he has been allowed to take those hits other qbs dont.

This is making me angry all over again.

At least they're saying exactly what we're saying now. And in the public eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs are still mad at Jerry because he was on the wrong side of the labor agreement with the refs and on top of that Cam questions the referee mob boss and tells the world what he actually said on the field.

The hits Sunday were Von Milleresque and very much illegal but since refs dislike Cam and JR it's OK?!? I'm glad the media is picking this up. It further shows the NFL has no integrity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...