Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Read Option at its finest...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

We need to stop building our offense around Cam's running ability. Build a god damn run game that can sustain itself without this read option bullsh*t and without Cam running. Once you build that and then add in Cam's running ability the offense will be tremendously more successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need to stop that . we need to bring in a vet at tackle to compete im not saying tackles our biggest issue but its up there . also what is it going to take to get shula out of carolina hes killing us , stop the read option already its not fooling anyone just have cam take the ball and run without it . also the running on first down and second every drive getting no yards is fuging killing us pass the damn ball . also how come our screens never work?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since some clearly don't understand the blocking scheme, allow me to explain.

 

In the option, you have a read man. In this instance, it's the DE at the top. He is unblocked because he is determining dive or keep. Williams, then, goes to reach the interior lineman. Trai is supposed to chip and get to linebackers level, but they blitz off the dive read's edge with their outside backer. Williams sees it, peels off the reach inside to pick that blitzer up. Trai takes the DT.

 

Cam sees the blitz as well, so instead of pulling and running off tackle, as designed, he now is filtered inside... where the blocking didn't work because the blitz caused the right side to remain static instead of moving up and creating space.

 

The play itself was fine. Just a good counter play by the defense that stopped it. Let's not forget we ran the same read option 3 times in a row for 5 yard gains later in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Since some clearly don't understand the blocking scheme, allow me to explain.

 

In the option, you have a read man. In this instance, it's the DE at the top. He is unblocked because he is determining dive or keep. Williams, then, goes to reach the interior lineman. Trai is supposed to chip and get to linebackers level, but they blitz off the dive read's edge with their outside backer. Williams sees it, peels off the reach inside to pick that blitzer up. Trai takes the DT.

 

Cam sees the blitz as well, so instead of pulling and running off tackle, as designed, he now is filtered inside... where the blocking didn't work because the blitz caused the right side to remain static instead of moving up and creating space.

 

The play itself was fine. Just a good counter play by the defense that stopped it. Let's not forget we ran the same read option 3 times in a row for 5 yard gains later in the game.

This. ^^^^ 

There was nothing wrong with the play design itself, just a better counter defense by KC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The play call is a problem because more teams are keying in and blitzing on the side. I recall in Cam's sophomore season Chudznski began favoring the Read-Option too much and Ron spoke up and said we needed to incorporate a more traditional approach to the run game, and it turned our season around.

I personally think that we DO NOT posses the pieces to run from a traditional I-Formation, I love Olsen as much as the next but he leaves a level of desire in the run blocking department. Tolbert is quite possibly the worst blocking lead back I have ever seen (recently cut in Madden), and Oher, and Remmers grade poorly in run blocking.

I think the reliance on the option/misdirection is to cover up and mask personnel deficiencies that we have. We don't have a Jeff King, or even a Ben Harstock, to me not having ONE legit blocking TE on the roster is a severe oversight by a team that wants to run. So what if it tips your hand (you don't think subbing in a 6th lineman tips your hand - Chris Scott), teams know we want to run anyway. Don't give me ''coach speak'' give me results, give me a roster that can ''run when we need'' to as Rivera said back when we was first hired.

Where's our play action passing game to slow the rush down, and like a poster said, where in the heck is our screen game, and I like what Fozzy brings, there's a burs to him that Stewart lacks, when you can't run through a defense, you have to look at running around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He bought himself a season last year with how well we performed, he has to many excuses that could cause him to be retained for at least one more season due to injuries across the offensive line, and Stewart for several games. I'd like to see Dorsey call the plays if we want to maintain playbook consistency.

As a fan I should not be able to guess our offensive plays more often that not, most of us can tell when it's a run or pass. You don't think DC's and players can as well. We telegraph so badly, this offense has ZERO pace, I understand keeping your defense fresh, but when you can't score points, to make an opponent one dimensional you are still asking your defense to do a ton of work.

We were able to see a good pass rush because we actually scored points, forcing teams to become one dimensional and the rushers could tee off. Now, we play it close to the vest and it allows teams to stick to their game plans, because we are going three and out in the second half damn near every possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...