Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouting the Panthers offense


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Interesting screen grab I saw on Twitter from the Amazon series about the LA Rams season. This is how the Rams viewed the Carolina Panthers offensive personnel last year 

I cleaned it up a bit to make it a little easier to read. 

ZEfhi9U.png

 

Looks like the color under each player mean something. 

 

Cam is the only one that is deep purple. Maybe elite player?

 

Red appears to be solid players. Olsen, Kalil, Turner, Benjamin, Stewart

 

Brown looks like average or role players - Norwell, Funchess, Tolbert

 

Purple looks like below average or backups to me. Remmers, Williams, Ginn, Dickson, Fozzy

 

Yellow looks like the bottom of the barrel or possibly the inactive players? Bersin, Artis-Payne, Hawkins, Simoson

 

 

Pretty interesting to see how other teams see the Panthers offense. If anyone can make out any of the text below the players chime in. Also chime in with your own thoughts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Icege said:

They've got Manhertz highlighted in black 

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

A player can outplay those three and still be terrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KSpan said:

Probably a total unknown.

Re: the classification, assuming this is correct it's interesting that they'd have Ginn rated at the same tier as Philly, Dickson, and Fozzy. Ginn definitely outperformed all three of those guys during his time in Carolina and was way more dangerous on any given play.

No one in the NFL is game planning for Ted Ginn. They know he is fast and more than likely will drop one or 2 wide open tds before the games out. 

Very similar to what is thought of Shula around the league. He's a hack and everyone knows it. The exact reason no HC interviews for him. Everyone in the NFL knows he sucks except RR. On that note I Hope he proves me wrong this year  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Brown looks like average or role players - Norwell, Funchess, Tolbert

No way in frickin hell that's true. I know it's the Rams and their coaching staff, but even they can't feel that Norwell is anything but a beast. Can they?

 

Dumbasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Michael McLeod is a Cane apparently..
    • He's going way overboard. I mean, men talk this way all the time. Bryce seems like a fine young man. But he's been piss poor at his job. I wish that I could be piss poor at mine---wait, no I don't---and get paid millions.  The thing is, I've supported Bryce in the past, but he doesn't seem to be the type of QB that what I've heard Chris Canty refer to as a "force multiplier." He can't make good players great, he needs great players to make him good. He's not going to pull out a win when times get tough (at least he hasn't), but he becomes good when there is essentially nothing to play for. After trying to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt, and waiting for the light switch to stay on, I'm tired of waiting. I've seen what I need to see, and it ain't pretty. So excuse me for calling Bryce, "pussified" for not being more aggressive in his pursuit of down field plays. He appears to just not have it in him. I'm sorry, Bryce and all Bryce Stans. He's still got to go though.
    • Yeah me too. We should have taken him. He was a much better bet than most of what you find that far down. He might have been 5 stars coming out of high school, I don’t know. Just that he was highly thought of. His college career didn’t get off to a great start and he ended up on a bad team with bad protection. But you could watch him and see what he had. I don’t see a way he doesn’t have a long career as a #2, at worst. 
×
×
  • Create New...