Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Carolina Panthers at Detroit Lions Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jopie87 said:

I am not confident that they would have 

A. Called the TO

B. Done anything other than taking a knee up by 7 on the road when they get the ball to start the 2nd half

Yep.

Even if we had those timeouts, TOP Ron would have kept then in his pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Look at this pitiful rushing stats. 

 

car.png&h=100&w=100 Carolina Rushing
  CAR YDS AVG TD LONG
Jonathan Stewart 9 13 1.4 0 8
Cam Newton 1 1 1.0 0 1
Christian McCaffrey 1 1 1.0 0 1
TEAM 11 15 1.4 0 8

Detroit's plan was to make them.win via Cam's arm, and Cam's making them pay. These rushing numbers are of no concern and things will loosen up next half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Correct. So did they say that Detroit recovered it?

Yes. Looks like Munnerlyn was the first to jump on it but the Lions took it in the pile. I thought it should have been reviewed and given to us on a clear recovery call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...