Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Worley Regressed?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I didn't see the game yesterday, but I downloaded it and was watching it last night before I fell asleep (long ass day)

Worley had not 1, but 2 pass interference calls in the 1st QUARTER. I fell asleep right after so I didn't finish, but did he play better? I'm going to guess no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be regression to me, I was asking for him to get benched seemed like he did briefly things went ok but he's a target to me. I've been saying if he played in NE we would have lost he would have been picked on consistently. Just how I see it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe my recollection is faulty about yesterday but, early in the game, when we weren't getting a lot of pass rush, Worley was awful and was being "picked on".

But later in the game, when the DL was getting consistent pressure, all of a sudden you no longer heard Worley's name that much.  Was that because he was out with injury (I do remember him picking up a knock... did he ever come back in afterward?)?  Or because the pass rush always improves the secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
    • Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL.  That’s not his tree.  Not in Seattle, Tampa or here.  Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC.  That’s what Bryce needs to happen though  2 very different things….and very much gets into why the middle school QB doesn’t fit 
×
×
  • Create New...