Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3rd and 21...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

The question is WHY IN GOD'S GOOD NAME DO WE RUN EMPTY ON 3RD AND 21!!!

For a team as poor at pass pro as we are we run several empty sets per game, and they rarely work out in our favor. The offensive staff is horrible, if fans can see that it's an issue. A middle-school football game plan beat us yesterday.

If you can't out coach that you DON'T BELONG IN THE NFL as a coach / coordinator. It's their job to put players in a position to exceed, and we do that rarely, we run tosses to Stewart, and we run CMC up the A gap into 8 man fronts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

Throwing it to Dickson would have been as effective as throwing it out of bounds.  3rd and 21.  A short pass to the LOS is a wasted play at best.

Cam knows he needs to make plays where plays aren’t present.

So many times it’s 3rd and long or 2nd and 10-12 and it puts Cam in a tough spot. A 5 yard dump off on 3rd and 21 is pointless to Cam (as it should be) but he gets blasted on here for it.

People would rather see us punt on 4th and 3 after a 5 yard check down on 3rd down than see us punt on 4th and 8 after Cam waiting for his WR’s to open enough to pick up the 1st.

We have idiots yelling “throw it away” on 3rd and whatever as if it matters. Dalton threw the ball away yesterday on a 4th down play, 80% of huddlers must’ve got up and applauded Dalton’s “high football IQ”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Should have rolled out to the other direction and could have been a big gain to Dickson.

Why doee he not remember which way his guys are going

Rolled into 92 for another sack? You can't see 92 right there?

You wanted it 4th and 30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...