Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"No one could run behind our line"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I feel like this isn't entirely accurate. 

 

The Panthers have three excellent run blockers in Norwell, Turner, and Williams. That is three more than many teams have. 

Tyler Larsen is an average run blocker. Not a plus, not a minus, typical NFL lineman. 

I'll give you Matt Kalil is awful, but most NFL teams have at least one bad offensive lineman. No excuse there. 

 

As such, instead of saying "No one could run behind our line" I propose we use the phrase "no one could run in our scheme" as at this point it is painfully obvious the woes in the running game come down to play design, coaching, and when they are called during the game. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's the line not Shula man . Shula ain't the one missing blocks Matt kalil and Williams are . Shula gets blamed for every little thing and still works hard each week and creates a good game plan for fans that don't care about him or the good job he is doing.

 

giphy (24).gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's the line not Shula man . Shula ain't the one missing blocks Matt kalil and Williams are . Shula gets blamed for every little thing and still works hard each week and creates a good game plan for fans that don't care about him or the good job he is doing.

Honest question : are u that guy on Twitter that hates me because he is Shulas cousin? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's certainly an element of play design in this, but I also have started to question the decision making on the field.  We know that Cam has options, and someone's calling out blocking assignments.  If this was all scheme even a pop warner coach would have adjusted by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's both...obviously.

You don't have a game where every RB posts a negative yards per rush avg. if either your scheme or your players have any quality at all.

Perfect confluence of suckitude.

My only hope is that Shula figures out how to be less predictable.  The scheme is overly complicated and the play selection is often questionable.

The real problem, though, is that the offense is out of sync.  When Shula calls a good series of plays (see the first drive in Chicago last week), the players don't execute (Samuel fumble).  We often end up in difficult down and distance, the pocket collapses (and Cam gets jittery), the ball is tipped, off target, or intercepted.

Then, Shula calls a real head scratcher.  Didn't we fail to score from like the 2 yard line vs the Eagles?  We suck in the red zone and that's mostly play calling.

Its a pattern of long developing plays, meaningless runs, wasted downs, etc.

Look at the ball possession in the Bears game.  WTF is happening?

We can't get any freaking momentum.  The players are not focused.

Everyone is to blame.

Including Rivera, who has reverted back to the same clock management issues from his first 2 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Either Turner, Norwell and Kalil are extremely overrated in the huddle or our RB flat out suck.

 

Either way I’m 100% positive that a good RB would have out produced both Stewart and Mccaffrey by now with this same line and scheme. 

I think Norwell is pretty overrated. I think he’s good, but not to the degree of the fame his look and demeanor get him around here. But I think the problem with our line is 75% on Shula. Between the calls themselves and almost as importantly how late the bad calls are getting in, the defense not only knows pretty much where we’re  running but also exactly when to fire off the snap in order to get an advantage over our OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...