Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera on Worley


dldove77

Recommended Posts

A reasonable follow-up to this statement: "Coach Rivera, please identify an NFL game that would suit Worley better than say, any other DB on the roster?"

 

 

 

And also:

"And with all due respect... WHY DID YOU WASTE A CHALLENGE AND A TIMEOUT AND NOT JUST RUN IT TO BEGIN WITH!?!?!!??!? YOU MOMENTUM KILLER!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GRWatcher said:

Seymour was the one CB that continually challenged Falcons WRs when he was close enough. End of the game, his over-the-back pass breakup along the sideline was textbook awesome.

That probably should have been a penalty. Even though he was going for the ball he got there too early. Of course it makes up for that bullsh*t no call on the pass to Samuel the drive prior to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bartin said:

That probably should have been a penalty. Even though he was going for the ball he got there too early. Of course it makes up for that bullsh*t no call on the pass to Samuel the drive prior to that.

He was making a play on the ball, which he has a right to as well. I think that's why the flag wasn't thrown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Bartin said:

That probably should have been a penalty. Even though he was going for the ball he got there too early. Of course it makes up for that bullsh*t no call on the pass to Samuel the drive prior to that.

I don't think so, the refs were letting the wrs and defenders battle it out it seemed as I saw a good few pushoffs and a little contact before the ball got there throughout the game so I if they would have started calling it closely like that, I would have likely lost my poo. Then again the refs were poo for both sides so I wouldn't have put it past them. Regardless I didn't think that the contact was enough to warrant a flag anyways, the commentators made it sound much worse than it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bartin said:

That probably should have been a penalty. Even though he was going for the ball he got there too early. Of course it makes up for that bullsh*t no call on the pass to Samuel the drive prior to that.

Not from where I was sitting, 11 rows up from that spot. He had the outside which would prevent the WR from going out of bounds and stopping the clock even if he had caught it. Seymour saw the ball coming the whole way and timed it perfectly. It's legal to lean in to 'play the ball' and that's what he did. Ref was no more than 5 feet away. Textbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been impressed by Seymour lately.  We shouldn't have expected much early on as he learned the system and the safeties he was playing with...but as time goes on he is looking better and might even be an above average starter in our system.  As much as many hate to say it, he was a great find.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

I gotta think Gunter would be a better option than Worley

Man I'm on this train let Gunter get his shot he's got experience and I'm assuming highly freakn motivated, Worley has a I can't cover sign he's getting a tacked imo the moment he steps on the field. No team has no weaknesses but this is getting blatant as ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...