Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints clearly the best team in the NFCS, and it's not close

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

Saints are the real deal this year. Their running game is scary good. While we are stuck with an innefective run option they are lining up a traditional 2 back set and destroying defenses.

Panthers have a lot of work to do, I'm not sure I have enough faith in the offensive coaching to get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted

It is crucial to win this week and hope they gameplan well during the bye week. But, I think we know now, Rivera sucks after a bye so I’m not expecting too much from the O. If they play well offensively Monday against the Dolphins, I will feel much better. Just goes to show what good coaching does (New Orleans)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RoaringRiot Community Regular

RoaringRiot

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Lobo said:

It is crucial to win this week and hope they gameplan well during the bye week. But, I think we know now, Rivera sucks after a bye so I’m not expecting too much from the O. If they play well offensively Monday against the Dolphins, I will feel much better. Just goes to show what good coaching does (New Orleans)

We have Jets after the bye...FYI

Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NavyPF4L said:

It's more so Brees 》 Cam if anything else... 

 

What do you really think Brees would have done had he of had our defense these last few years

Brees is better than about 29 starting quarterbacks in the league.

Not really sure what point you're making here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

We’re 6-3.  I’m ready to see us move to 7-3 tomorrow.  

Its just too soon to be worried about that stuff.

We got MIA, BYE, JETS.  Olsen should be back for the jets.

Were getting better, healthy at the right time.  AND as a historically better second half team I’m hopeful the team gels and hits it stride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Veteran

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, NavyPF4L said:

It's more so Brees 》 Cam if anything else... 

 

What do you really think Brees would have done had he of had our defense these last few years

The same Brees who got benched for Doug Flutie in San Diego?

 

Brees without Payton is Andy Dalton 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...