Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Article, Gettleman vs Reese Drafts


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, JARROD said:

Playing money ball with Jordan gross, Steve smith, ted Ginn twice, josh Norman, to be followed by Olsen and TD etc.

cute was tongue in cheek, apologies if the need to spell everything out is your thing.

Here’s the deal...he made unpopular moves but they were the right moves. 

Smitty - Wanted 10 mil a year to be a guy who has a couple good games and doesn’t block or help in running game. Also was a profoundly difficult teammate by all accounts. DG let him walk and the Ravens signed him for 3 years/ a max of 12 million. I guarantee you he could have stayed here for that...he didn’t want it so DG called his bluff

Norman - Wanted to be richest defender in history. No way he’s worth that. Especially with KK up for a contract. DG called his bluff and let him walk. Only thing I’d have done diff is let him play under the tag. A long term deal wasn’t happening. 

Ginn - Would have loved to have kept him. Bad move.

Hurney walks in and immediately gives contracts to Olsen and TD. Immediately it’s apparent TD has lost a step. Olsen proceeds to miss essentially the entire reg season suffering an old man’s injury. Were those good deals? Maybe if they’re cap friendly. But if they aren’t then Hurney is doing the same thing he did previously which is keep guys around a year too long and give out money that could be used to make the team better. A million too much  here and a million too much there...do that for 5 diff guys and you’ve just lost a potential game changer bc you spent all the cap on “program guys” who you feel like you owe. It’s just bad management. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Here’s the deal...he made unpopular moves but they were the right moves. 

Smitty - Wanted 10 mil a year to be a guy who has a couple good games and doesn’t block or help in running game. Also was a profoundly difficult teammate by all accounts. DG let him walk and the Ravens signed him for 3 years/ a max of 12 million. I guarantee you he could have stayed here for that...he didn’t want it so DG called his bluff

Norman - Wanted to be richest defender in history. No way he’s worth that. Especially with KK up for a contract. DG called his bluff and let him walk. Only thing I’d have done diff is let him play under the tag. A long term deal wasn’t happening. 

Ginn - Would have loved to have kept him. Bad move.

Hurney walks in and immediately gives contracts to Olsen and TD. Immediately it’s apparent TD has lost a step. Olsen proceeds to miss essentially the entire reg season suffering an old man’s injury. Were those good deals? Maybe if they’re cap friendly. But if they aren’t then Hurney is doing the same thing he did previously which is keep guys around a year too long and give out money that could be used to make the team better. A million too much  here and a million too much there...do that for 5 diff guys and you’ve just lost a potential game changer bc you spent all the cap on “program guys” who you feel like you owe. It’s just bad management. 

First sentence into your Smith paragraph and you're already talking out your ass. Steve Smith was the best blocking receiver I've ever seen play for this team. The guy loved to lay wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Moorgan said:

Unless, I'm mistaken, no one on this board knows why he was fired. Did that information come out and I miss it? As far as I knew, there was still silence as to why DG was fired...officially.

It was JRs plan all along to let Dave go and let Bene take over. Bene dipped so we get Hurney again unfortunately. This is a story I got from someone inside the organization. JR is much more hands on than he leads to believe. Cap is fixed at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Here’s the deal...he made unpopular moves but they were the right moves. 

Smitty - Wanted 10 mil a year to be a guy who has a couple good games and doesn’t block or help in running game. Also was a profoundly difficult teammate by all accounts. DG let him walk and the Ravens signed him for 3 years/ a max of 12 million. I guarantee you he could have stayed here for that...he didn’t want it so DG called his bluff

Norman - Wanted to be richest defender in history. No way he’s worth that. Especially with KK up for a contract. DG called his bluff and let him walk. Only thing I’d have done diff is let him play under the tag. A long term deal wasn’t happening. 

Ginn - Would have loved to have kept him. Bad move.

Hurney walks in and immediately gives contracts to Olsen and TD. Immediately it’s apparent TD has lost a step. Olsen proceeds to miss essentially the entire reg season suffering an old man’s injury. Were those good deals? Maybe if they’re cap friendly. But if they aren’t then Hurney is doing the same thing he did previously which is keep guys around a year too long and give out money that could be used to make the team better. A million too much  here and a million too much there...do that for 5 diff guys and you’ve just lost a potential game changer bc you spent all the cap on “program guys” who you feel like you owe. It’s just bad management. 

The question you have to ask is it hurney or JR giving the contracts. If it's the latter we are in for a world of hurt because we have a older team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

Here’s the deal...he made unpopular moves but they were the right moves. 

Smitty - Wanted 10 mil a year to be a guy who has a couple good games and doesn’t block or help in running game. Also was a profoundly difficult teammate by all accounts. DG let him walk and the Ravens signed him for 3 years/ a max of 12 million. I guarantee you he could have stayed here for that...he didn’t want it so DG called his bluff

Norman - Wanted to be richest defender in history. No way he’s worth that. Especially with KK up for a contract. DG called his bluff and let him walk. Only thing I’d have done diff is let him play under the tag. A long term deal wasn’t happening. 

Ginn - Would have loved to have kept him. Bad move.

Hurney walks in and immediately gives contracts to Olsen and TD. Immediately it’s apparent TD has lost a step. Olsen proceeds to miss essentially the entire reg season suffering an old man’s injury. Were those good deals? Maybe if they’re cap friendly. But if they aren’t then Hurney is doing the same thing he did previously which is keep guys around a year too long and give out money that could be used to make the team better. A million too much  here and a million too much there...do that for 5 diff guys and you’ve just lost a potential game changer bc you spent all the cap on “program guys” who you feel like you owe. It’s just bad management. 

everybody wants a hard ass until the hard ass actually shows up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JARROD said:

Playing money ball with Jordan gross, Steve smith, ted Ginn twice, josh Norman, to be followed by Olsen and TD etc.

cute was tongue in cheek, apologies if the need to spell everything out is your thing.

Gross... Aging vet who wanted more money then he was worth... Oh. And  we were in cap hell.

 

Smith... Fan favorite franchise player who had a huge cap hot and was becoming a distraction in the locker room... Oh, and we were still in cap hell.

Ginn... Wanted money after we gave him a false sense of security.tell me... Who led the league in dropped air yardage while we had Ginn as a wr? Wasn't anywhere near worth what he wanted.

 

Norman.... Nothing but a slightly above average corner that actually has been exposed over and over in Washington. Wanted to be paid top dollar cuz he self inflated himself in the media like Sherman

 

TD... aging vet who we already drafted a replacement for in the first round. Love him to death, but there was nothing saying we WEREN'T gonna re sign him, just didn't have anything saying we were either.

Olsen... Still had 2 years left on a deal and already complaining about wanting more money, wasn't a priority when we have other people in their contract year to extend...

 

 

Is that spelled out enough?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Moorgan said:

Unless, I'm mistaken, no one on this board knows why he was fired. Did that information come out and I miss it? As far as I knew, there was still silence as to why DG was fired...officially.

JR caught Gettleman in bed with his bojangles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, over the legal limit said:

Giants fans better be ready to see Gman draft DLs and LBs.

that's pretty much what they did when gettleman worked for them before. people mocked them, but they kept showing up in superbowls and winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...