Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Bad Is The Packers Red-Zone Defense? They're 32nd In The NFL And Allow 100% Of RZ Drives Turn Into A Score.

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

Their biggest weakness is their pass defense and that's our biggest weakness on  offense. They have a poo OL so if we can blitz Rodgers we should sack him fairly easily.

Ya know unless Rivera sucks like he normally does and has the CBs play 15 yards back to allow Rodgers to easily pass it to a WR who doesn't have a defender within 15 yards of him. Which he will do and easily convert since his WRs aren't trash WRs and Rodgers is one of the best.

You have to be up on the WRs and blitz him until he taps out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Well...

 

I think we put up 35-40 points on this D the way our offense is starting to click (meaning Cam has gone ape poo awesome down the stretch). I know some of you are arguing that we weren't really that good last week except for a few big plays, but the vikes are a damned good Defensive unit, so I call BS to that argument. Granted, if Rodgers is anywhere near 100%, he'll get his, but I think we outscore them because our D is better, plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I think we put up 35-40 points on this D the way our offense is starting to click (meaning Cam has gone ape poo awesome down the stretch). I know some of you are arguing that we weren't really that good last week except for a few big plays, but the vikes are a damned good Defensive unit, so I call BS to that argument. Granted, if Rodgers is anywhere near 100%, he'll get his, but I think we outscore them because our D is better, plain and simple.

Cams passing stats and our downfield passing game have been bad for 95 percent of the whole season. Im wondering what will happen when we have a game when the run game gets shut down 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

People like to poo on shula but we put up 30 on a Vikings Defense that feels a bad day is 17 points. This is probably the easiest defense we have faced since the Dolphins. If our defense can get to Rodgers and our offense keeps the gas on we should win this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Snake said:

People like to poo on shula but we put up 30 on a Vikings Defense that feels a bad day is 17 points. This is probably the easiest defense we have faced since the Dolphins. If our defense can get to Rodgers and our offense keeps the gas on we should win this. 

turnovers and 2 huge run plays were big into contributing to that total. Its not like we methodically drove down the field for every TD.  You generally win when you win the turnover battle whatever the other circumstances of the game might be, and Vikings made it easier by dropping of multiple TDs or big downfield passes

Answer is somewhere in the middle. We certainly didn't blow them out by any means. Even with all those turnovers and huge gashing runs game was still tied late in the 4th. It was far from a masterpiece from Rivera and Shula who were sitting on a less than 2 score lead for alot of the game

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • thunderraiden
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By thunderraiden · Posted

      They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
    • KillerKat
      We need angry Aho back

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Exactly what I am thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...