Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

According to Olsen the other refs tried to convince the head ref that it wasn’t grounding


gorillamilitia13

Recommended Posts

Just now, w280sax said:

It was borderline.  Refs shouldn't decide the game unless it's blatant and obvious.

It wasn’t even borderline. It was 100% obviously not grounding. Bersin was there, AND Cam was clearly out of the pocket

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I debated whether to post a thread about this, but I suspected it.  Cam, Olsen, and Rivera all kept trying to get the head official's attention and were yelling at him motioning to the back judge it appeared.  The way they were screaming and gesturing, it appeared they were saying the back judge saw it and said it wasn' grounding...  so, needless to say, I was shocked that the head ref didn't even run to meet the back judge before getting on the mic to make the call.  But, after SB50 and the 2013 divisional 49ers game, I'm no longer surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was on par with the 49ers playoff game and superbowl. How many fuggin times are we going to get hosed and just take it? God let our next owner be someone that won't take this. Hope the NFL continues to lose viewers. This product is at an all time low between the performance on the field and the obvious rigged reffing. I honestly think I'm done with football. Between the superbowl, 2016 headhunting Cam, and now this, I can't do it anymore. Sh*t isn't even fun anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure half the people saying it wasn't grounding because he was out of the pocket don't understand that the pocket isn't those lines on the field.  It depends on where the ball is spotted before the play and we ran it off the right side.  Cam was only a couple steps was from where we started and was in the pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...