Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculative thread: Was Ron On Board With This, or Was It Strictly A Hurney Decision?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I'd be interested to find out.  I have a feeling it was purely Hurney.  Ron is a very loyal guy, and I don't see him ever firing one of his coaches, let alone two, unless it came from up top.

...and if it was Hurney, give the man some mother effing credit.  Boss ass move.  We've been waiting for 5 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron and Mike have been together since 2013, Ron has seen firsthand the terrible calls and decisions Mike made over and over. Now Hurney returns and all of a sudden Mike isn’t good enough anymore...

It was either Hurney on his own or both of them trying to impress new ownership... I’m 100% certain Ron keeps Mike if JR is still around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'd be interested to find out.  I have a feeling it was purely Hurney.  Ron is a very loyal guy, and I don't see him ever firing one of his coaches, let alone two, unless it came from up top.

...and if it was Hurney, give the man some mother effing credit.  Boss ass move.  We've been waiting for 5 years!

it was ultimately RR's decision...lol...of course it was hurney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...