Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now OC is done, should we now be focusing on DC now that it seems Wilks is as good as gone?


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

It sounds like the coaching carousel is going to pass by Wilks this time. Apparently the finalists for the Giants job are McDaniels, Patricia, and Shurmer with Patricia as the fave. The fave for the Cardinals seems to be Shurmer. He's not interviewing with the Colts (McDaniels or another offensive guy here) or Lions (Patricia as their #1, Vrabel as their #2 from what I've read).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

It sounds like the coaching carousel is going to pass by Wilks this time. Apparently the finalists for the Giants job are McDaniels, Patricia, and Shurmer with Patricia as the fave. The fave for the Cardinals seems to be Shurmer. He's not interviewing with the Colts (McDaniels or another offensive guy here) or Lions (Patricia as their #1, Vrabel as their #2 from what I've read).

I could see the Lions taking a look at him. I mean there standards are somewhat low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I don't believe this at all.
    • His PPG actually did go up a little in Colorado. We will see. I still sort of believe we saw pretty close to the peak of his abilities last year. Not wishing him ill or trashing him in any way. Just tend to believe we did sell high and correctly so.
    • Well, other teams also had an offseason. I honestly agree with him. Right now I have way more faith in Coker ascending then I do XL. I think it's the TE/WR group dragging us down. Plus he does mention that the list was made with WR's very much valued more than RB's and TE's(I understand the thought process). In that context, we have a very aging AT, two "wait and see" second year players(one leaning bust) and a rookie.  I really think this is a very fair rating, on paper and in the offseason. Quite frankly, aside from the aforementioned and aging AT, this is a bunch of guys still trying to prove themselves.  Then when you go to TE, it's easily a bottom 3-4 unit on paper. That is probably being extremely generous.  RB is where we make our hay. Probably a top 5-10 unit. But....he mentions early in the article that he doesn't value the RB units as much.  So, really, it's the weighting of the skill positions that is what really fugs us.
×
×
  • Create New...